#antisocialism

[capitalism-and-analytics]

[thealbionroyalist]

Reaganomics and Thatcherism

[disgruntled-foreign-patriarch]

Anti-Communism is a Heroic Act

You cannot convince me otherwise

[thealexiscowdell]

[historybizarre]

The Socialist Origins of International Women's Day | JSTOR Daily

Why is International Women's Day on March 8th? The answer is much more complicated than you might think.

As historian Temma Kaplan writes, International Women’s Day has its origins in socialism and the conditions of working women. Kaplan acknowledges the importance of secular communal holidays for nineteenth-century socialists, communists, and anarchists, citing Bastille Day, May Day, and various anniversaries of the Paris Commune. These holidays were more about “the solidification of a sense of community” than the actual date they fell on. That said, it’s worth noting how oddly complicated the history of this holiday is, complete with invented backstories and shifting dates. Here is a rough chronology:

March 8, 1857: A women textile workers’ strike does, or maybe does not, happen in New York City. As Kaplan’s article explains: the origin of International Women’s Day was “a story I have had recounted to me numerous times and therefore know well. A spontaneous demonstration staged by New York City women garment and textile workers in 1857, protesting low wages, the twelve-hour workday, and increasing work loads, was dispersed by the police, rather brutally.”

She goes on to reveal, however, that French scholars have called this origin story into question, suggesting that the strike was invented retroactively as a way to give the holiday a compelling, non-socialist backstory.

[thegurlwhoplayedwithfire]

[libertarianhimess-blog]

myths about anarchy.

HELLO EVERYONE! Today I gonna talk about myths about anarchy, but waiittt!! I have some warning:

𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 𝐏𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐄

► It´s my first text totally in english without translator. If I sight stupid, sorry, I’m and I am trying read that shit. XD

► This text is an informal text, so don´t wait  amazing things, but I´m reading  with the intention of passing serious information.

► I am an Anarcho-Capitalist, so I don´t use the same definition of  terms as anarcho communists, for example.

1- "Anarchy is a thug and criminal thing”

HM... NO!1!1! Anarchy is not a thug and criminal thing. It´s  an ideology that aims at the protection of private property. This protection includes life and freedom. The State constantly violates your natural rights. Anarchy proposes your right over your property.

2- “Anarchy is disorder”

What is order? Sorry, but but stealing peaceful people through a false propaganda of democracy, in my view, is proof that the state is a disorder.

3- “We need a state”

This is not exactly a myht about anarchy, but it is a myht about humanity, lol. State emerged around 6,000 years ago, yes, 6,000 years ago. I could get into a debate about anthropology, but it´s not my idea, not today ;p

In 6,000 years, do you think that society does not have technology and infomation necessary to survive without state? WE ARE SENDING SATELLITES TO THE FUCKING MOON AND YOU THINK WE CAN NOT LIVE WITHOUT A COERCIVE MONOPOLY!1!1!

So, this was a little text about some arguments and training my english :) . If any person liked, I can read more.

BYE BYE, STATIST.  (¯`v´¯)