art blog(derogatory)
I'd rather be in outer space đž
Sweet Seals For You, Always

PR's Tumblrdome
Xuebing Du
Sade Olutola
KIROKAZE
hello vonnie
NASA

Discoholic đȘ©
Claire Keane

izzy's playlists!
EXPECTATIONS
$LAYYYTER
tumblr dot com

Love Begins

pixel skylines
Noah Kahan

No title available
Show & Tell
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from Albania
seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from TĂŒrkiye
@disgruntled-foreign-patriarch
Notice a pattern? Every time Muslims are taking lands that arenât theirs and lose it - they call it a genocide!
They're now saying they're indigenous to Spain. You can't make this up.
Reblogging because relevant
Anyone using the word "genocide" incorrectly may be ignored, because their opinions are stupid.
They fail to mention how it became an 80% Muslim country. It wasn't by choice...
Ugh, It was a Christian country before being literally invaded by the Muzzies
If I were a murderer, and I'd meticulously planned a murder, and then I turned up at the place to do the murder and found that world-famous-murder-solver Hercule Poirot was also there, I would simply not do the murder.
He'd still know. He'd take you out to a fancy dinner and regale you with stories of his past accomplishments interspersed with sincere compliments about your attire and the way you wear your hair. Then, the moment the waiter collects the desert plates, he'll say he say just "one more little story" and then lay out your entire murder plan in front of you from start to finish. Everything's there. Even the drunk ex-actor you hired to pretend to be you while you were committing the crime. That guy isn't even here. He was going to show up tomorrow. You haven't even telegrammed to cancel yet. The only thing he couldn't figure out is how you were going to dispose of the clown costume before Lady Ellison found it inside her hat box. Stunned, you tell him you were just going to throw it in the lake weighed down by some rocks.
"Ah, well," he says, a brief look of disappointment crossing his face. "That would have made this case entirely too easy to solve. It is perhaps for the best you have reconsidered, no?"
You ask if he's going to turn you in. He looks genuinely shocked.
"Turn you in for a crime you didn't even commit? Mon Dieu! Not even Hercule Poirot could be successfully doing this!"
"Truly?" you say, your hands shaking slightly. "But...you know I fully intended to kill him. If I hadn't seen you on the train, I would have gone through with it."
"But you did not," he says precisely. "And you will not ever, now that you know the eye of Hercule Poirot will forever be upon you. There is no crime in anger. There is no crime in hatred. There is even no crime in wishing to do the murder. The only crime is in the doing. And Hercule Poirot only concerns himself with crimes."
He looks you in the eye, then. And now you can see it, the truth of this silly little man. Past the little body and the prissy outfits, past the ostentatious moustaches and egg shaped bald pate. You thought yourself so smart, so clever, so righteous in your anger. And he saw through you in an instant. This silly little man who wears his own vainglory like a polished, perfectly straight tie pin would have sent you to the gallows without a second thought.
He didn't need one. He'd figured you out with the first.
"You have chosen not to do. You have done so for the best of reasons, because you recognize the folly of trying to outsmart Hercule Poirot. But even if your reason was not so great, I would celebrate your choice all the same. There is no such thing as the bad reason to choose against staining your soul with murder."
With a polite smile, he pays for your meal and leaves before you can say anything else. You never see him again. The next morning you book passage back home. You see the man you were going to kill occasionally, out and about. But for some reason the old anger you always felt in his presence, the righteous fury that burned in your breast at the very whiff of his cologne, the pain that tore through your body every time you thought of how he has wronged you, never returns.
He is just a person, you realize. A loathsome person, but a person nevertheless. In the end, it is not your place to judge him. It had never been your place. His judgement rests in the hands of someone much wiser and more just than you could ever be. Than even the great Hercule Poirot could hope to be.
You never see that silly little man again. But you keep him in your prayers for the rest of your life.
He kept you from making the worst mistake you ever could have made. And you are grateful.
This is lovely
I had one as a kid!
Same! It's still at our family's lake house
Since 1979.
Sounds like a win
If they want to wear that shit, stay in the shitholes that developed them. Don't pollute the West with that degenerate filth.
Have you ever smoked a cigarette?
Yes
No
Once or twice in college/law school when I was very very drunk.
đđ»đșđž
I HATE when people use the Weeping Virgin Mary statue for their aesthetic.
Ma'am, that is a HOLY woman sobbing over the fact that her son got brutally tortured then crucified
Unless you are using it reverently and with honor for the Virgin Mary that I can respect, but using it for your " this is what makes us girls " aesthetic posts BOILS my blood and it's mad disrespectful too
It also represents her unending sorrow over the sins of humanity. The Holy Mother weeps for us, her fallen sons and daughters, both out of supplication to the Divine for mercy, and out of great unending sorrow for our fate should we not repent.
You know that third world behavior of playing really loud music in public places like busses, trains, subways, or their stations? Why is it ALWAYS the most dogshit music ever slopped together by man? That's half the problem for me.
I'd be much less annoyed if someone just started blasting some Moonlight Sonata or Vivaldi's Four Seasons on the bus.
The mentally ill could be here
What are the odds that yet again thereâs a random attack by a migrant stabbing a native European?
well it is mental illness. The mental illness is called Islam.
getting lost in boston is fun because I turned around on a street corner three times and some guy yelled "hey stupid! the bus is that way!" very helpful interaction and accurate insult, 10/10 no notes
one time I walked around a building a couple times looking for a bathroom and this guy went "this bitch thinks she's on a merrygoround, where the fuck are you tryna go? bathroom? one floor down to the right behind the door that says bathroom."
My very first time in Boston. I was absolutely miserable, trying to drag my giant suitcase up a lengthy set of stairs in the pouring rain. This guy who had already reached the top looked back at me with the most pure expression of disgust Iâve ever seen in anyoneâs eyes, marched back down the stairs, grabbed my suitcase, carried it to the top, left it there for me, and walked away without ever saying a word. I think about him often.
For the people in the notes going "why is Boston like this": a) the insults are a way to show you have no ulterior motives when helping someone (and don't need to be thanked or repaid), and b) Boston was settled by the Irish
also the Italians. mixing Irish and Italian sociocultural attitudes had the effect of multiplying the Sass Levels by the power of infinity, in the sense that you get all of the clever dry wit of the Irish and all of the bitchy gossipy condensation of the Italians rolled into one very stereotypically overly-friendly American package.
also worth noting that who you are to them doesnât matter. theyâll talk to strangers like that and will also talk to their best friends like that. theyâre just Like That.
More from the notes:
That's just how New Englanders are in general. Actually good and helpful people, but you're gonna get insulted too.
U.S. Central Command announced that a new wave of strikes against Iran began - the first since the announcement of 2 U.S. soldiers killed in Jordan.
The new wave of U.S. attacks against Iran is expected to be far more powerful than past ones, with U.S. President Donald Trump telling military decision-makers to rain hell on Iran.
@acatholicrose
First of all, let's make sure we understand where our sources come from. Pope Pius XI indeed did write an instruction recalling the faithful to modesty of dress on January 12, 1930. In there were instructions to continue to dress modestly even in athletic competitions, but nowhere in the document are the guidelines listed above found. The document can be found in Latin in the official record of legal documents from Catholic Church, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 1930, p, 26-28.
The guidelines given for women's modesty of dress actually come from a "Marylike Standards for Modesty in Dress" added to an English translation of the document by "olvrc.com," which is cited by many "traditional" sources.
Even if you do not know Latin (as any traditionalist ought to, but many embarrassingly do not), you can see through comparison that the original decree has twelve points and the addendum has six additional points. Misleading at best.
Secondly, modesty in dress is largely culturally conditioned and far overstressed in contemporary Christian discussions about chastity. Far more important historically has been the concept of custos oculi, custody of the eyes, clearly required by our Lord Jesus when he said,
"You have heard that it was said, âYou shall not commit adultery.â But I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell." (Matthew 5:27-29)
Christianity that is paying attention to the words of Christ knows that it sin is primarily in the lust in the heart, not in the dress. If one has a problem with chastity, look first to they eye and to the heart. Custody of the eyes is commanded by Our Lord and chastity is first of all a matter of the heart.
Good grief its not that hard to dress modestly.
At face value, this is a ridiculous headline. But the article then says his managers berated and insulted him for leaving the party after an anxiety attack, and the company then fired him for taking days off work for âunsafe work practices,â due to having anxiety?
Seems like pretty often headlines that paint a lawsuit as frivolous and ridiculous seem a little more rational after some digging
Thereâs so much more to it as well. He repeatedly asked the company not to throw a party for him due to his anxiety (apparently this is standard practise for their office and he knew it would be triggering for him) and they âforgotâ about his request. On the day in question, he predictably had a panic attack and went to his car to do breathing exercises.
The next day he was called into a meeting where he was insulted and grilled about âruining the partyâ and âstealing his co-workersâ joyâ, which caused him to have another panic attack and start doing coping behaviours like hugging himself, at which point his employers decided he must be angry and was going to turn violent. They then suspended him for days and later told him heâd been fired.
So yeah, itâs not over an âunwanted birthday partyâ, itâs over employers repeatedly failing to accommodate someoneâs disability, trying to frame them as the villain for having accessibility needs, and firing them for not conforming to some stupid office politics.
Source with the court documents
I am completely pro-lawsuit. Lawsuits are often the only tool that otherwise powerless individuals have to demand some accountability from large corporations and institutions, and historically lawsuits have been a very important tool for civil rights, womenâs rights, LGBT+ rights, and disability rights. But this is exactly why the media is always depicting lawsuits as something frivolous and silly that only uptight spoiled crybabies who want easy money do, and people just eat up that propaganda without doing any research or critical thinking.
REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO PROPAGANDA AND THAT SENSATIONALIZED JOURNALISM FALLS UNDER THAT
Never forget that McDonaldâs coffee gave that lady 3rd degree burns and she just wanted money to cover her medical bills.
as much as I want to tell this sad sack to get over himself and eat the damn birthday cake, I am also pro-lawsuit because sad sacks like this generate lots of business for my guild.