#any era

[histendercaress]

💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕I just wanna give him hugs and kisses. Put him in my pocket to keep him safe, warm and protect him forever and always💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕

[mossfilledskull]

I saw that TikTok comment talking about how Paul would’ve treated Pattie better than George did, and it got me thinking about which of the beatles (and in which era) would be the best partner (for me)

Pre-Beatles: I’d date Ringo, and only Ringo. I love Ringo. “But he’s in a gang!” “But it’s the 50s, he’s probably misogynistic!” Don’t care, smash, next question.

Early 60s (touring era): All of them are terrible boyfriends/husbands. Absolute sluts they are. It’s a bit ridiculous actually. Not to mention that with the touring, a good relationship would be very difficult. I would date none of them. Although, smash.

Late 60s (non touring era up till breakup): Cheating would still be bad. But now that the touring has stopped, I feel like there’s potential.

I wouldn’t date Paul in this era (mainly because I’m not a fan of McBeardy) because the control freak is unmatched here. He would get on my nerves. Also, I’m not equipped to deal with the post breakup depression.

I wouldn’t date George in this era either. The cheating. George is a bad partner (love you geo)

Wouldn’t date Ringo either, Mo left him for a reason. But smash.

Definitely wouldn’t date John. I mean, you could say that in this hypothetical scenario, he wouldn’t be with Yoko, and so hypothetically he may not be doing heroin. But still, Get Back John needs to be ran through a car wash. Very gross.

70s (post breakup): There’s potential for cheating, but there’s also potential for a relatively stable relationship. Depending on the Beatle.

If we’re talking farmer boy Paul hiding his depression, no. But Wings, McMullet?… yeah. I’d be willing to give it a try. Mostly because I’m madly in love with that mullet. But also, that review of Ram saying that Paul deserves to get his entire ass ate for Monkberry Moon Delight… I mean…

I love George’s mustache so much. And his hair. Geo was stunning all throughout the 70s. I still feel like he’d cheat on me. But yknow, I think we could make it work. I’m polyamorous, so hypothetically, if he’d be open with the fact that he’s seeing other people, everything would be fine. But I can’t get inside his mind, so idk if the taboo and secrecy is apart of the appeal for him, or if he’s just really horny.

Ringo. I love Ringo so much. I don’t think I’d date him here though. Alcoholics scare me. That video of him and Moonie (which I treasure dearly, I love them both so much) where they’re both so very visibly drunk, while amusing, I don’t think I could do that. He is absolute hot as fuck tho. Smash.

Okay, now this may contradict everything I just said, but I think I’d date John in this era. Specifically, once he stops using heroin. I feel like dating lost weekend John is a bad idea, and yet it sounds enticing. And I think I would marry late 70s John.

80s (rip John): Even greater potential here, but specifically the late 80s. Early 80s is just…

Much like with McBeardy, I don’t think I could handle the depression and emotions (and the repression thereof). However, 80s Paul is drop dead gorgeous, absolutely stunning, so so very hot and sexy, holyfuckingshit. I would gladly be his temporary secretary.

I love 80s George and his garden so much. However, I love him like a grandpa. Normally, I’m all for wanting to fuck old men. But I look at George, 80s and on, and think “aw what a cute little old man.” and nothing more.

80s Ringo? Even scarier. Genuinely. Maybe post 88, once he’s sober. But idk. Alcoholics really scare me.

1980 John, I would kill for you. He’s not perfect, but the amount of growth he’s had. He’s literally gorgeous. He’s got his shit together. I love him so much.

Conclusion: I have trauma around alcoholism, Paul is sexy, and dilf John is my soulmate even though he died while my dad was an actual infant (11 m/o).

[rosengeist]

This is unironically really important. Friends, help me, I need GOOD "bad movies".

It can be any genre, any year, can ostensibly be good or bad, but its gotta have the right fun/dumb/wtf am I even watching? Energy.

Example - Face/Off is PEAK this. Epitome of this. So bad it becomes a work of garbage art and ends up being fun. The stupid shit becomes really endearing and amusing, and suprisingly well done scenes get shine.

The Mummy (1999) also has this vibe, even if its more coherent. I suspect Showgirls might get me feeling this way, but I have not seen it. Hot Frosty or Malignant are the most recent ones to hit this, but even then, both were like...1/2-2/3rds there.

So....simultaneously dumb, but enjoyably dumb, may or may not have good elements like sincere acting, genre love, competent or even good action pieces, that sort of thing. Like where its trackable, it may even be competently made, but the fun is very high. The dumb is not an insult, the dumb IS the point.

This is unironically a mental health thing. Help me find new fun dumbs.

[sleepybamboo]

Repost Challenge! Make an aesthetic board for your favorite historical figure/figures from ANY era you wish! Tagging(no pressure): @marsingtonn, @raise-a-gla55-2-fr33d0m, @floofyquenchiest, @doodle-blight, @ryderthegay, + Anyone else interested!

[llittletingoddess]

Can he pour it on me pls

[horsegirl]

watching another country for the first time in a million years and i cant believe how much of it is obviously lifted from the charioteer, down to the finding his mother under his father after he died mid fucking. adapting the charioteer i think would have made for a much better movie...

[zappedbyzabka]

Alpha Kreese and Silver fucking omega Johnny on the dojo mats while he drips a puddle of slick beneath him from how much he likes it. Gets their cocks absolutely soaked, and his face turns rosy like his bitten lips when they tease him for the gross squelching sound of them pounding his wet hole. Tell him his pussy is just as loud as him.