pls, i need clarification: ruby & sapphire are lesbians and very much in love with each other. garnet, though, is not ruby & sapphire, she is garnet, she is a completely new gem and this gem is aroace. do i have that right?
u got it!
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from Russia
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
pls, i need clarification: ruby & sapphire are lesbians and very much in love with each other. garnet, though, is not ruby & sapphire, she is garnet, she is a completely new gem and this gem is aroace. do i have that right?
u got it!
i’m sorry but you could literally headcanon any characters but rose, pearl, garnet, sadie and lars as aroace. (rose, sadie and lars are bisexual, garnet and pearl are lesbians) there’s so many characters that dont have canon/implied sexualities that you could headcanon as aroace. like...you don’t need garnet. you don’t.
you really need to re-examine why you think garnet would be the best character to headcanon as aroace, because there has been multiple instances in fandom where black characters were headcanoned as such so that people could get them out of the way to ship their white faves together.
it’s just...garnet is the embodiment of lesbian love. she sung a whole song about how much ruby and sapphire love each other. she rejected jamie because she is already in a relationship-or rather, she IS a monogamous lesbian relationship. no one is aroace for simply being in a relationship.
stop saying garnet is aroace when you could quite literally headcanon p much anyone else as aroace. just stop.
@ppl saying garnet can't be aroace because she's black: nice job hypersexualizing women of color!! nice job invalidating me, a nonwhite aroace, who garnet is good representation for!! fuck off!! (thanks for defending us, by the way)
aa ty, I kinda wanna stay out of that argument as much as I can other than redirecting ppl to this post bc im white..
When garnet is formed her gay feelings don't just poof away. It's part of who she is she literally IS love. Saying that she's aro erases that. I could see her being ace but aro? That doesn't fit at all.
the embodiment of love doesn’t have to be in love with anyone other than herself
Why are you wasting your time arguing with people about the sexuality of cartoon characters? What is the point?
why do ppl bother arguing with pewey shippers that pearl’s a lesbian?? bc she is and they want their fucking representation, just like me
the point is I want my damn representation too, jfc
aroace lesbians exist 👌🏻
they sure do but hell nah is garnet one she’s aroace
lovin that beautiful aroace woman👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
@okgal21 said:
I can see both sides of the argument. She is the embodiment of lesbian love, and she sees herself as a closed relationship so, Garnet would not pursue a relationship, nor presumably feel any romantic feelings for anyone, making her aroace. I mean that’s how I see it anyway.
ye a she’s canon coded aroace...
ruby and sapphire are lesbians, garnet isnt... this is really easy concept really lol
ye s idk why everyone is saying “you’re awful lesbophobe for wanting representation of your sexuality” everyone’s in such a pissy mood with me being upset that they’re erasing garnet’s sexuality
(btw @ anyone reading this: if you’re anti aroace garnet please don’t screenshot this and harass me)