#arthurt

[hannah367]

Even though I just heard of this ship, like, less than an hour ago, I already love them lol

I like Arthurt and Spunkle as ship names.

@saveme-storybrooke-potc @kiraixi

[keaganz]

In an alternate timeline Kurt survived and is helping Arthur with his murder body count

In an alternate timeline Kurt doesn't go after Jessie and he doesn't kill on live stream. He still kills but it makes sure they are altered as to keep his identity secret. Kurt is no fool! Maybe even starts a only fans because killing turns me on and he figures why not capitalise on that and get paid!

His followers think that the blood, bodies and other killing paraphernalia are fake and props. One day Kurt comes across Arthur's vids and he gets jealous before falling in love.

In the end they help each other kill and hide the bodies.

[snowshinefivez5]

Art trade with 5 beautifully talented darlings! @doggwwoggy23 @iamlunamoonlight725 @Aden @C.M.G @peppermintlife54

Have I gone insane...yes...yes I have

[fuckyeaharthuriana]

[starry-peachies]

“I think I need you to make a con Save”

love the curse of Stahd reference

[noahcoma]

you know when you said you want to write sonnets about arthur's hair? I felt that

RIGHT? he is a gift to us all.

[awesome-facts]

A new Awesome Post has been published on Awesome Facts

New Post has been published on http://awesome-facts.net/til-that-in-1912-criminologist-arthurt-macdonald-suggested-making-it-a-misdemeanor-to-name-assassins-publicly-stating-that-this-would-lessen-the-hope-for-glory-renown-or-notoriety-which-is-a-grea/

TIL that in 1912 criminologist Arthurt MacDonald suggested making it a misdemeanor to name assassins publicly, stating that "This would lessen the hope for glory, renown or notoriety, which is a great incentive to such crimes.”

TIL that in 1912 criminologist Arthurt MacDonald suggested making it a misdemeanor to name assassins publicly, stating that “This would lessen the hope for glory, renown or notoriety, which is a great incentive to such crimes.” submitted by CatamountAndDoMe [link] [881 comments] Source: top scoring links : todayilearned

[francesco-passiatore-fad-blog]

Artist Research - Arthur Rackham

Visual Communications

Arthur Rackham, 19th September, 1867 - 6th September 1939, was an illustrator for English books.

Born in Lewisham (which, back then was still part of Kent), Rackham was one of 12 children and began to study part time when he was 18, at the Lambeth School of Art.

 He started working as a reporter and illustrator in 1892, for the Westminster Budget (a british national newspaper which ran from 1893 to 1904) and had his first book illustrations published in 1893 in 'To the Other Side' by Thomas Rhodes. Rackham's first serious commission was in 1894 however, for 'The Dolly Dialogues' which were the collected sketches of Anthony Hope (English novelist and playwright).

From that point forth, book illustrating had become Rackham's career for the rest of his life. By the end of the century, Rackham was contributing his illustrations to children's periodicals on a regular basis. He would later get married and have one daughter.

The technique Rackham used in his illustrations were primarily based on robust pen and India ink drawings. Within time, he would perfect his own expressive line from his background in journalistic illustration and paired it with a subtle use of watercolour. This was a technique which he was able to exploit due to the technological developments in photographic reproduction at the time. To begin with, he would first lightly block in shapes and details of the drawing with a soft pencil, and for the more elaborate colour plates hr would often utilise one of a small selection of compositional devices. He would then carefully work in lines of pen and India ink and he would remove the pencil traces after the drawing had begun to take form.

For coloured images, he would begin the painting by building up multiple thin washes of watercolour in order to create translucent tints. 

A disadvantage of the 3-colour (later on became 4 colour) printing process in the early years was that definition could be lost in the final print, which had Rackham sometimes compensate this by over-inking his drawings one more after painting.