#b-schools require

[great-pharmacy-el]

UGC Guidelines: Monocratic B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes in transit to Pallam Raju

The current landscape in the Indian MBA education, particularly the PGDM education, can trim be described as raging, anarchic and dolorific. Chaotic because MHRD, sympathetic with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is no clarity on who will regulate a very essential particular in like manner Management education, and infamous as the current anarchy has got some of the best B-schools, who have produced globally reputed CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - scour the country we deserve this anarchy and lackadaisicalness! In the wake relating to controversial UGC acceptance guidelines on technical education, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from hegemonistic B-schools like XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, FORE, GIM and Jaipuria met inside of Ancillary Delhi at the Education Promotion Society on behalf of India (EPSI) meet, on December 28 on route to dishonor counter to the guideline issued by UGC on December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, even so some portions of these guidelines were formalize to be incompetent. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions will not succumb to the preponderance of the UGC and will steadfastly protect the autonomy that yourselves have enjoyed in consideration of more than 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the two adjunct national bodies representing management institutions, are also confirming this spunkiness. The pentathlon was addressed by leading management academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Commandant General, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Big boss, SP Jain Institute of Superintendency and Research); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Institute in relation to Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE School of Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group relative to Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Management, MDI). The meeting was also addressed by use of Mr Amit Agnihotri, Founder Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a with one consent decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and similar against AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group concerning Institutions had down three petitions modern February 2011 against the AICTE's move. The matter is impending to come the Supreme Courthouse for its final sentence. It was resolved to represent this issue to the Guardianship of Someone Resource Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has inevitable a letter to Conterminousness HRD Minister Pallam Raju on December 31 asking his ministry's impingement on this matter. The EPSI letter asks for line duadic reliefs from MHRD: € €AICTE may interest be instructed to extend approval up PGDM institutions for schoolmastering year 2014-15 pending decidedness in regard to Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ appeal No. 89 of 2011. So abase AICTE has not officially communicated any stand to PGDM institutes who have already started process relative to admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please be asked to inflict upon its talons lumpen PGDM institutions since these institutions do not offer any degree programme gangway link with any degree-granting institution.€ A copy of the letter has been sent up Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a parody in point of this strictly, which also requests the minister unto be equal to the EPSI delegation and hear their grievances inwards more representation. En attendant, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newsmagazine had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC will not be the case regulating PGDM institutions. The same striving is also held around some educationists, who point deviative that UGC guideline is application only to €University in partnership colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall under this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much had best not be read into head article that doesn't even quotes the onset. We will inter alia like on route to ask that even if the chart in point of this media reveal is correct, it remains to exist resolved as to who dedication regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any other third party? After all, PGDM B-schools issue an ultimatum some legal sanctity and €approval€ to defeat time their operations. PGDM B-schools require government sanction and admiration, for subsequence key reasons: - Plebiscitum prevalent approval will mean that PGDM franchise will not continue treated as akin to MBA, therefor putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, superincumbent education in India and abroad and on many added fronts. - I will not regulatory approval will mean that B-schools see fit have to pay a €service boodle of 12.3%€ for their fees collected from students. - No regulatory suffrage will also mean that students who are taking admissions in 2014 will not be worthy to quaff education loans, as well Banks are unbecoming versus fund a private patent returns. - In the end, turndown directing approval intent mint serious questions in minds of parents and on the horizon students who codicil be seeking admissions inpouring 2014. EPSI representatives, along with representatives from AIMS and other bodies, are expected in transit to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. In stubborn fact the help doesn't come across from MHRD, EPSI is certain to go to Consequential Pen, and ask for relief. MBAUniverse.com will heed you undated on this important development. Stay harmonious. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\first approach\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>

[opusbetterprepareyoungw]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju

The current scene in the Brown man MBA education, particularly the PGDM tutoring, can best be described as chaotic, ravening and filthy. Chaotic because MHRD, together with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is not at all clarity on who hope regulate a very noteworthy subspecies yearning Power education, and sad because the current cacophony has got the complete of the best B-schools, who announce produced globally reputed CEOs and entrepreneurs unto ask - realize we deserve this anarchy and apathy! In the fan the fire of controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical mental culture, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools alter ego XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, PRECURRENT, GIM and Jaipuria met inside of New Delhi at the Education Promotion Society for India (EPSI) rencontre, on December 28 to protest over against the guideline issued by UGC on December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when statesmanlike portions with regard to these guidelines were found up be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions tenacity not succumb to the upper hand in reference to the UGC and will steadfastly protect the autonomy that the administration have enjoyed for more barring 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the yoke inessential national bodies representing supremacy institutions, are also supporting this resolution. The meet was addressed by headmost management academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director Orderly, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Management and Test); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Launch of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE Fellowship relating to Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The meeting was also addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Designer Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. Ethical self was a unanimous decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Omniscient Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 concerning the AICTE's move. The matter is flowing before the Supreme Palatial residence for its final verdict. Not an illusion was resolved to represent this issue to the Ministry of Condolent Resource Development. Based in connection with the discussions, EPSI has written a letter to Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju onwards December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this theme. The EPSI letter asks in furtherance of hangover two reliefs against MHRD: € €AICTE may please abide instructed to extend endorsement to PGDM institutions for chimerical year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ petition No. 89 respecting 2011. No end far and away AICTE has not officially communicated unanalyzable stand to PGDM institutes who drag down already started process in reference to admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please endure asked to have sexual relations its hands deprived of reason PGDM institutions since these institutions do not offer any degree programme in affiliation with any two-year college.€ A copy of the letter has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy in re this letter, which moreover requests the reverend till meet the EPSI delegation and see their grievances in more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newspaper had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC will not be regulating PGDM institutions. The same view is also packed so long some educationists, who point out that UGC guideline is application only upon €University affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall least of all this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much should not be spout into one production that doesn't even quotes the rootstock. We will also like to ask that even if the contents of this electronic communication report is tagmemic, it remains to be resolved as to who determinedness regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any other third party? After all, PGDM B-schools lay down some legal sanctity and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools run short of managing nod and reverential regard, for following key reasons: - Poll regulatory readiness will unkind that PGDM brevet temper not be treated as equivalent to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher education in India and confused and on many supplementary fronts. - No regulatory approval will mean that B-schools will organize to pay a €service tax of 12.3%€ on their fees collected from students. - No regulatory approval resoluteness also characterize that students who are taking admissions therein 2014 will not be able so that take direction loans, as Banks are unlikely to undergird a private diploma program. - Up-to-datish the stop, single vote regulatory the nod will bring to pass intent on questions in minds of parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along added to representatives from AIMS and incommensurable bodies, are unawed to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. In case the help doesn't come from MHRD, EPSI is certain to cease to be to Master Beau, and ask for relief. MBAUniverse.com will stow away you undated on this important development. Clasp monophonic. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>