During Neil Matheson’s lecture on street photography, I discovered that photography is about the exchange on the street between either the photographer and subject matter or the subject matter and themselves. It’s not about the perfect focus and composure, but more about the interactions between people or even animals. Photographers like Helen Levitt, Vivian Maier, Lisette Model, William Klein and Robert Frank, have managed to capture these interactions beautifully.
Eamonn Doyle was one of the main street photographers we looked at. Martin Parr stated that Eamonn Doyle is “the most important street photographer he’s seen in a decade”. He uses his local area, which is a restricted area in Dublin. He shoots very low looking at people, by shooting low you can crop a lot out of the picture and capture the subject matter perfectly. Visually, it gives the subject matter power over the photographer, where as most street photographers hold the camera high and therefore holds the power over the subject matter. He worked in the music industry also and therefore collaborated with musicians and expanded photography by breaking traditional photographic boundaries using innovation. He published 3 books: ‘I’ in 2014, ‘ON’ in 2015 (the picture above was published in this book) and ‘END’ in 2016.
Joel Meyerowitz, another street photographer, used colour film in his work. In the days of his work, 60/70’s, colour was very new and a commercial version of photography. The image above, West 46th street 1976, shows that it’s very hard to work with colour in street photography because it can be fairly chaotic.
Philip Lorca DiCorcia, one of the other main street photographers looked at, uses the street as a theatre. He uses unusual lighting conditions, normally a powerful flash as shown in his New York 1997 photograph. DiCorcia made an on going series of work named ‘Heads’ from 1999 to 2001. He used artificial light and captured people in the street without their knowledge. The image above, Head 13, is an image of Nussenzweig. This man sued DiCorcia for the picture because it was against his own beliefs. There was a clash of intention, however, the man lost the case due to artistic grounds. This case shined the light on ethics and people’s privacy and right to their own image and security.








