This is a bit of a vent/rant, but I need to get this off my chest.
Bittersweet Candy Bowl, at its core, seems to convey a very distressing moral lesson.
The way in which Lucy’s abuse of Mike for a decade is minimized, and how no character seems to seriously bring it up or resent Lucy for it, compared to how Mike is vilified for verbally snapping at her once (which he apologized for afterwards and multiple times) coupled with how Augustus’s SA of Daisy was softened and excused by the narrative as “Augustus is used to manipulating people to get what he wants” leads to a horrific conclusion.
At its core, BCB seems to be a lesson on why you should take your abuser’s violence to keep the peace, and how you should be a perfect victim or you’re as bad as them. The way in which Mike is compared to being as bad as Lucy (for only sending letters in the 3rd grade, rejecting her, and verbally snapping at her once after years of being beaten bloody) , and the author’s comments on how Daisy appreciates the attention her groomer Augustus gave her and how she’s wrong for feeling that way after being assaulted seems to be teaching a very dangerous lesson.
I myself have been attacked before, having my head beaten into a concrete pillar and needing to be rescued by my brother. Additionally, I have known several victims of abuse and care about them dearly. The way that this narrative and webcomic is geared towards young children and young teens who may take the lesson that keeping the peace is more important than their safety and wellbeing is quite concerning.
I truly wished the author would have addressed these issues with far more grace, but it appears to be the case that they will continue victim blaming.