When I’ve just learned that @Jeffrey_Beall‘s list of predatory journals has vanished
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
seen from Poland

seen from Australia
seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Nicaragua
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
When I’ve just learned that @Jeffrey_Beall‘s list of predatory journals has vanished
Beall’s List Still Lives... Kinda
Hey Y’all,
It was a dark day for academia when Beall’s list vanished from the internet. However, nothing on the internet ever truly vanishes. I’ve found a cloned version of it.
The List
Predatory open access publishers
“In academic publishing, predatory open access publishing is an exploitative open-access publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals (open access or not). "Beall's List", a regularly updated report by Jeffrey Beall, sets forth criteria for categorizing predatory publications and lists publishers and independent journals that meet those criteria.”--Wikipedia.
At least, that list was available until recently; it has now been shut down.
What responsibility do libraries have to help their faculty identify appropriate publication venues? Is a blacklist or similar database a good way to achieve this? If so, how should it be maintained?
Beall's List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. We recommend that scholars read the avail...