Trigger warnings
A recent School Library Journal article “Trigger Warnings and Emotional Distress” describes the question of trigger warnings in this way:
Librarians, educators, and free speech advocates are divided over the benefits—and potential harm—of trigger warnings. Supporters say that advance warning about certain types of content serve to protect students from trauma they may experience while absorbing passages involving violence, sexual situations, or other content. Opponents claim that a warning amounts to the same thing as labeling a book, leading down a slippery slope to censorship.
How can libraries balance their responsibility to provide unfiltered access to materials with their responsibility to make them more accessible to students who have experienced trauma?
Should this be handled differently for different types of materials (e.g. violence vs. sexual situations)? Or in different kinds of libraries? (school? public? academic?)












