
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from China
seen from Denmark

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from Yemen

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from United States
Boom.
It’s as plain as day. SACSCOC doesn’t allow substantive change during the application process or the candidacy process. Read it for yourself.
Some examples of “substantive changes”?
They can’t have asked for approval before or during this process as both Steve Pettit and Randy Page claim. That’s not how SACSCOC’s rules work. They can either make this substantive change before applying or they can wait until after accreditation is granted.
But SACSCOC’s own rules are explicit.
Applicant and candidate institutions may not initiate substantive change.
Not.