#bounty:33

[bounty3]

My strange drawings, someday I will like them, I hope

What happened to the picture quality?

[bounty3]

Just little Michael Afton

I have a headcanon that Michael really didn't like what was done to Mangle, so he would often fix her as a child

[bounty3]

Reflections

Why don't many people talk about them being brother and sister? I mean, yes, it's obvious, but they lived in the same house, and their childhoods were more or less the same. Aside from Michael's extraneous behavior, he's literally Vanessa in the first film before Mike; he just wasn't lucky enough to meet his soulmate as a sister. I think he had doubts after William's death; maybe he tried a "normal" life and just couldn't. (They're so cute, my god 😭)

[bounty3]

Reflections

It's time to talk about Nathan's suicide method. My favorite remains the pills; they fit the picture best. I mean, ghosts have marks of death, like an axe or a knife in the back, but Nathan doesn't have any. I also really like the possible scene where Abaddon sees his dead body and then eats the remaining pills (my favorite glass).

Waiting 2nd season

[bounty3]

Reflections

"Michael is completely underdeveloped!" Partially, yes, we haven't seen much of him, but if you go over him and his backstory a little less superficially, the main pillars of his personality emerge. In the first film, William clearly called Vanessa his "favourite”, while talking about Mangle, the fleeting remark about children seemed to me to be rooted in personal experience, his father got him a job at a defunct pizzeria, what else is needed? The rest can be clearly seen in parallels with Vanessa.

[bounty3]

I watched "Haunted Hotel" and it's wonderful (Abaddon is such a sweetheart)

[bounty3]

Spring lock scars on Michael’s body

I don't know, but for some reason it hurts my eyes when they paint scars all over Michael's body like William's. If you look at it that way, then from where? Pizzerias were abandoned, which means they were in childhood/adolescence, but still how and why. Under what circumstances was an ADULT costume worn on a relatively small child (I mean in size). Even if William had tested the measurements on Michael (which is strange), they simply would not have fit, that is, they would not have looked like William, hence the idea of a test on a child seems even more unreasonable. I understand that sometimes it's figurative, but if someone thinks he has them, then the main question is where he got them. I think that it is the scars from the mechanism of the suit that he does not have. (it will be interesting for me to read the opposite versions in the comments, I'm waiting)

[bounty3]

I tried, OK? Maybe I’ll try again soon