(blackpill feminism community on Tumblr, op deleted)
What does "feminism" really want for women?
I mean there's many different variations and waves of feminism but they all somewhat agree on the overarching historical theme of patriarchal rule dictating female behavior. But honestly.... I really think there's so much more to this conversation, there really is. I am starting to believe that when you become a "feminist" it's an untold nonconsensual condoning of certain people, groups, and entities you aren't aware of that I don't feel comfortable with at all. It's heavily rooted in the mythological idea of "matriarchy" paired with heavy mother-ruled, goddess worship. Down to the idea of where these queerism, genderism, transgenderism, these people of history were male eunuchs with higher positions over regular females who sacrificed themselves, engaged in perverted sex rites for the mother goddess who often also represented the sex trafficking in those times as well. I feel like it's like some kind of ancient war to have some form of "mother-rule" over every single human being and that seeded itself into the various forms of feminism we've read about, which I don't like, because it's placing motherhood, female fertility and sexuality as the highest form of female existence. It just puts a very bad taste in my mouth, just like patriarchy but I've yet to put this properly in real words that actually make sense lol. I also think it's such a fraud as well, mothers already exercise enough control, power and decision-making in the home and arguably society, so again what are feminists truly fighting for women? It's DEFINITELY NOT for women who are for separatism, independent lifestyles, SSA women, wanting actual liberation, it's to enforce this mother-rule paired with father-rule over humans, it's precisely why they are not and have never been interested in total systemic change but have been working with the father-ruled system to give them what they want.
I mean like I've said before you don't really see the female manifestation of this planet here, just co-authors (man and woman) where the female representatives are trying to get back to their rightful places of the heterosexual rulership. Even in a spiritual context, it's told it's a male God that created everything but through looking at the details there's always some male god needing a female god to "create" with (ex. Isis and Osiris, Ares and Aphrodite, Yahweh and Asherah) but it has no interest on something I've never seen before in my entire life and honestly no woman has ever seen: a female deity who represents females who creates the entire universe, world, groups of people by herself through partheogenesis, no male companion, she is entirely self-sustaining, self-generating, self-reliant and whole. I feel like the female representation (ruled by Venus, Moon, Earth and sometimes water/sea figures). They can't even get me to be interested with their adoption of mythological figures like Lilith who people claim to be truly "cold, independent" it just feels boring, uninspired, overcompensating and does not feel relatable to how I truly felt. I hope this makes sense, it's been in my mind for awhile now.
“dArk fEmInInE fEmMe fAtAle gOdEsS”
I’m so tired of having to hear about muh Lilith or any other “dark feminine” symbols. They’re all annoying, self-centered whores, no different from the ones you’re already surrounded by who are entirely concerned with living out their lives in a male mode of existence: preoccupied with sex, hyper-independence, and fake dominance. I’m tired of hearing liberal feminist ideals (which is beautifully encapsulated by Lilith’s mythology) being compared to separatist/BP, hell, even very few radical feminist views. No I don’t want to be like Lilith, the epitome of daddy issues, chokers, ahegao, devouring lust, manic woman’s pursuit of power, the demonness of Onlyfans and funfems.
Someone commented on my last post about what Valerie Solanas said about the difference between “daddy girl” and the untamed woman but honestly Valerie did not give me the same vibes I have of the Lilithian adoption most modern women and modern feminists have adopted. I feel like it’s the Madonna-Whore complex a lot of women juggle in their lives: be a bitch, be a saint, be Lilith or be like Eve, but honestly that’s not what I really want. The bitchiness, coldness, constant boundary building comes with a total deprivation and eventual annihilation of your spirit, the opposite ideal where you’re to capitulate with the predator to be a vessel to bring even more of its evil into world is also not what I want. Valerie Solanas was above this Lilithian independence, she was just in a totally different and rare category, honestly she wasn’t really even trying to be a feminist or cater to anyone, she was probably very desperate to finally be taken seriously during her lifetime full of an abusive, neglectful, poverty-filled existence. The Lilithian femme types don’t want to be taken seriously, it’s why for years they have been made fun of and turned into a meme with their radioactive hair, shrew attitude, and absolute disregard for anybody but themselves. These types are honestly artifacts of the heterosexual paradigm that’s constantly seesawing from traditional sexual values and the unbridled, pagan sexual values and I want nothing to do with either. I’ve realized this planet is very obsessed with two-dimension programs, obsessed with duality, left-right, ying-yang, conservative-leftism, man-woman, it makes me think even deeper about honestly what are we truly, trulyyyy supporting. I mean even a philosophical moid from the past has sort of made a good dichotomous point on this manner: the Dionysian vs Apollonian cultural values.
This life that we live in is deeply embedded in breeder-rapist (XX and XY) worship, not just maleness. This is the true blackpill, you can never truly get away from this shit, even if you’re celibate, asexual, it’s in the language, it’s in the shows you watch, the people you come across and allow in your life.