#brian patrick

[doogieverse]

i used to have this hannah montana pillow that i used to pour milk on and suck the milk back out of and it was sopping wet all the time 😭 i used to slam it against the walls and it would make a loud thud

[philosophical-aesthetics-blog]

By Brian Patrick

Brussels, 1932, Henri Cartier-Bresson

The studium of this picture is two men walking the streets of Brussels displaying some pretty fashionable clothes. The mustache the man on the right has can also be considered part of the studium because Belgians of this time would frequent the mustached face. This very mustache is the punctum as well for me, though. This is because I myself know what it takes to grow a nice looking mustache and know that it honestly takes some time to make it look good. Another punctum that I find is the picture is a recollection I put into this painting because of the two men. To me, it seems that they are peering through the tarp to try and see what is on the other side. The memory this recalls are the many summer days when my friends and me would go out on the town and come across a very similar scene, and then try and guess what exactly is going behind this mysterious tarp. 

[philosophical-aesthetics-blog]

Brian Patrick 4/18/2018 Which Is More Creative: Fiction or Nonfiction

No writer has ever sat down to make their next work and asked themself how similar they can make their work to another. No, they sit down to tap into their creativity. So what is creativity then? I will define creativity as a process of creation or an original concept through thought. The role of creativity has a heavy impact as to why we enjoy a work. No one after finishing a book has ever thought that they want to have another book exactly the same. No, we want to read something that gives us new things to think about; new things to imagine. The question I now ask is whether the fiction or nonfiction author has more creativity when they write?

A brief definition of each of these categories is in order. Fiction regards the works that narrate events and/or characters that are not real. Nonfiction is that which describes events and/or characters that are real.

When talking about the creativity, there are actually many similarities between the two. The most important similarity being in the actual creation of the narration of the events, or the actual words used in the description. The creativity of the description does not lie in the hands of the subject being described at all actually. It is all in the hands of the writer on how creative they want to be in their description. Because of this, we cannot yet decide whether fiction or nonfiction is more creative.

There is one way though that we can differentiate in the creativity of the categories. That is through the subject being depicted. The subject is actually what makes the work fiction or nonfiction: decided by whether or not the subject is real. Starting with nonfiction, the subject being depicted is something that actually exists. The subject is actually real and is perceived in reality, and we describe it as it being so. However, fiction is something entirely different. Fiction’s subject lies completely in the phantasy of the author. While subjects of fiction can very much be inspired by things in reality, for example historical fiction, the subject is still created inside the mind. The subject has no reality to it at all. Because of this creation inside the mind, I have to say that fiction merits the title of more creative. Solely for the reason that the fiction author creates the subject being depicted, whereas the nonfiction author depicts something they have not created.

It must be said that this does not discredit a nonfiction work as being enjoyable though. This is because subject creativity does not equal enjoyment. If this claim were not true, we would never be able to enjoy history, politics, or any other subject that nonfiction will take up. It is the case though that we can in fact enjoy history and politics. Why is this then? I believe it is because the thing being described will never be actually grasped. No matter how many descriptive words that are used, an author can never truly depict something the way it is in reality. A perfect example of this is a biography. No matter what we learn about that person, we do not know the person in their wholeness as that person. Because of this, our mind starts being a little bit creative itself and creates its own ideas relating to that which is being described. Why that is, is another topic all on its own.

[philosophical-aesthetics-blog]

3/7/2018- Brian Patrick "An Analysis of a Compliment"

I am of the type of person that when you give me a compliment, I get really weird and uncomfortable. However, there are a few exceptions, for example, when I walk down a hallway and someone compliments my tie and I start to get thoughts on what exactly a compliment is, and what we do whenever we give a compliment. Thank you Matt.

As I said, I recently had thoughts about what exactly a compliment is. In this post, hopefully, I will cover what exactly a compliment is, and relate compliments to the Aristotelian ideas of causes of being and being itself.

What exactly are we doing when we compliment someone? In my personal experience, we are pointing out the beautiful in another, for example: I love your eyes; you are very athletic; you are very intelligent; etc… However, a distinction has to be made between the types of compliments. As one can see in the examples given, there is a certain aspect of varying depth to the compliments, here seen between the differences in the beauty of the physical person; the person’s abilities; and their human faculties, respectively. Why is there this difference, other than for the reason of the beauty we are acknowledging is found more and more in the person themselves?

How would one give the greatest compliment then? Based upon this, one sees that the greatest compliment to be given is to give the compliment to the person themselves as the person themselves. Let me explain, Let’s say that a boy named Joe walks up to a girl named Mary, the greatest compliment he could give her is to say that she has the best being of herself, quite romantic. Don’t go using that on people yet to make them fall in love with you.  Obviously, this whole idea of complimenting being sounds very strange. This might be because the ideas of being in the Aristotelian perspective might be a little fuzzy for most people, if it has been a while since their last metaphysics class, or that they have just never heard of it. Therefore, a brief definition is in order. Form is an intrinsic cause of substance, along with matter. Form takes matter and determines what is. I am in the form of Brian, a dog has the form of dog, and so on. The two main compliments one will receive will almost always fall under either a compliment of a formal cause or of a material one: examples of each being when we compliment someone’s human faculties or their soul as a whole we compliment their form, because the soul and its accidents, found in our faculties, are the form of the human; and material compliments are given to what actually makes us up. Why is it then that I say that complimenting the what is, is the best way to give a compliment. This is because, by complimenting the being, we compliment the root of the person themselves. Complimenting the being compliments all aspects of the being, both in the formal and material causes of the person. The compliment of the beauty of brown eyes, athleticism, and intelligence of the person, all pale in comparison to whenever we compliment the beauty of their being.

[anastpaul]

(via https://soundcloud.com/ewtn-radio/morning-glory-brian-patrick-9915-danny-abramowicz?utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=tumblr)

[catingub]

277/366: Man Alive!: Transformation by Brian Patrick

The next talk was given by Brian Patrick, a radio host based in Cincinnati, and it as titled "Transformation". Patrick was filling in for Danny Abramowicz, a former NFLer who could not make it to the conference because of a family emergency. Again, I'll share some of the points I took down.

The minute we open ourselves to the grace of God, God's grace comes pouing in.

The transformation begins within ourselves.

Contemporary culture has seemed to lose the sense of good and evil.

Ephesians 6:12 - For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

We need to become spiritual tough guys. What makes us men are our spiritual, mental, social beings as well as our spiritual life.

We need a spiritual regimen that makes us spiritual tough guys.

As the men of our Church, we need to man up and be the spiritual leaders in our families, our Church, and our communities.

The Spiritual Workout:

1) Stretching in prayer: Prayer is our first calling and our highest calling. Prayer is the raising of our hearts and minds to God.

2) Running away from sin and running towards God: Even Christ was tempted. We need to be quiet, to be still and know He is God.

3) Going to and receiving the Sacraments: Especially in the case of Reconciliation, we don't have to live with our sins because we are forgiven.

Now, there are many transformations in our lives whether that comes from the mundane and daily decisions to go for a run or exercise, thus transforming into a healthier person, or the profound and life-altering transformations that have us accept Christ or accept our own vocations. It is easy to see the fruits of our labours in a physical transformation months later or an intellectual transformation when we receive our scholastic evaluations. It is not always apparent to see how we are positively transformed in our spirituality. Patrick did make a great point, however, in tying the need for spiritual transformation to our existence as souls.

As he quoted Ephesians 6:12, Patrick enforced the idea of keeping spiritually tough. Just as we must train ourselves to be strong if we are athletes or to be physically fit if we desire better health, we must take hold of spiritual regimens to strengthen our spirituality. Man is both body and soul; one suffers if the other is not healthy. So it is up to us as men, whose typical portrayals include being brave leaders, tough guys, and inspiring patriarchs, to be strong in our faith. We cannot hope to stand against the very demonic powers that tempted Christ (Luke 4) uless we, ourselves, are strong in the faith. 

I found the talk fitting because it appealed to me, not only as a man, but as someone starting a fitness program. I've been out of shape for a long time but the last two weeks have been liberating in the sense of understanding that these gains will not be instantaneous; I have to work hard for them, build up a foundation, and then stand stronger upon that foundation. As a result, I've come to enjoy running. I've come to see that I'm starting to return to the flexibility I had when I played hockey often. I've come to understand that building strength will not be without its pains.

So in the very same way, the three points of Patrick's spiritual workout are things that I hope to appreciate. Just as stretching might be thought of as unnecessary to build strength or stamina, it proves to be central if we don't want to hurt ourselves or lose the gains we make. Prayer can often be overlooked, as it has been for me, but it is central to our existence as Catholics. We have to persevere in prayer so that we do not get hurt in the snares of the world or lose the gains we make in Christ. A little prayer everyday is a great start. And from there, running to God in our temptation mirrors running to strengthen our cardiovascular systems. If we turn to Christ when we are weak, then we are strengthened through Him. When we succumb to our sins that sets us back a couple of steps but never completely apart. Much in the same way, the only thing that prevents us from taking up new programs to build ourselves up is ourselves.

Finally, to receive the Sacraments is to build up our own spirituality and faith just as receiving wisdom and knowledge to make strength gains is. Both are freely and widely available. Both are beneficial to us. Both require us to come forth, to make the decision ourselves, to receive them. To receive Reconciliation often is to strengthen our faiths, to build up our resolve and to make that decision not to sin if we take the Act of Contrition seriously. To receive the Eucharist, Christ Himself, is to be in such a state of grace and communion with the Church. Both build us up as Catholics and surely both can only point to a greater faithfulness and love of God. 

(October 29 for October 3, 2012)

[groundbeneathmyhands-blog]

Who is our neighbor: the Samaritan? the outcast? the enemy? Yes, yes, of course. But is is also the whale, the dolphin, and the rain forest. Our neighbor is the entire community of life, the entire universe. We must love it all as ourself.

-Brian Patrick in Earthspirit