After reading much about American Architecture in the 20th century with a few references to Le Corbusier’s modern principles and the Athenes Charter, I am wondering if the intellectuals of this world will once think about changing the world in a more organic way, starting at the ultimate start point which I believe is the state of mind. I am here answering to the whole 20 and 21st century’s ideals where the masterminds thought that changing the living territory, mostly urban ones, would give the people a fresh image on which to base a new form of living. Frank Lloyd Wright, fort his part, Notably in his Broadacre City, considered that the new way of living would start in the family and in the house, and that the rest of society would organize itself through a natural and organic economical order based on the family’s creative work. Even though his ideal would’ve ask an automatic-almost-transcendental massive conversion process from the population because of the radicalness of his principles, where he failed the most is at building practical strategies to apply those well researched and strong values based principles of new living. He said it himself, if he had 80 years more to live he would've been able to change the world. Changing a world to a perfect world implies to reach the very base of every human’s functional system : the values. In a recent Roko Belic’s documentary “Happy”, many answers to happiness presented were similar to Broadacres ideals : family, creative work, nature, community life. Though the sources here are very short listed comparing the importance of the statement im making here, it is to say that I am mainly talking of out feeling and intuition. So I’m thinking, in this back-to-nature need we are experiencing now in 2016, has anyone thought of bringing back the principles of one of the greatest american architects of all time (FLW) and develop an applicable method to apply them to our contemporary needs ? ....Which would mean to create a social change by working with the values that create happiness, thereby creating a life that grows organically from strong bases instead of imposing re-directional massive buildings that, even though built from a humanistic approach and for a free-humanistic and better living objective, oppresses our liberty to develop a world we want, as humans. It was Oscar Niemeyer’s moto when he helped building Brasil’s new monumental capital Brasilia. He was not looking to shape a form of living, but to build a patrimony to which Brasil’s population would be able to identify. Thereby Brasilia and its monuments were symbols of the country’s emancipation and of the colonial years deletion. To him, life was more important than architecture. He said himself that Architecture can't transform society. To project a social architecture is an illusion, because a real change depends on revolutionary mouvements of economical et social systems in place.