Oct 18, 2020
sometimes law school stresses me out but then I read cases like this:
and lol I can feel the judgement and salt by the person who had to write this up
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from China
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
sometimes law school stresses me out but then I read cases like this:
and lol I can feel the judgement and salt by the person who had to write this up
I do case digests for a fee too. https://www.fiverr.com/s2/d039b3161d?utm_source=com.google.android.apps.docs_Mobile
Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan (GR. NO. 172035) Since a pre-suspension hearing is basically a due process requirement, when an accused public official is given an adequate opportunity to be heard on his possible defenses against the mandatory suspension under R.A.
Villareal vs. People (GR. No. 151258) In light of the finding of violation of the right of Escalona et al. to speedy trial, the CA’s dismissal of the criminal case against them amounted to an acquittal, and that any appeal or reconsideration thereof would result in a violation of their right against double jeopardy.
People vs. Lara (G.R. No. 199877)
People vs. Lara (G.R. No. 199877)
The right to be assisted by counsel attaches only during custodial investigation and cannot be claimed by the accused during identification in a police line-up because it is not part of the custodial investigation process. This is because during a police line-up, the process has not yet shifted from the investigatory to the accusatory and it is usually the witness or the complainant who is…
View On WordPress
People vs. Ayson
It is clear from the undisputed facts of this case that Felipe Ramos was not in any sense under custodial interrogation, as the term should be properly understood, prior to and during the administrative inquiry into the discovered irregularities in ticket sales in which he appeared to have had a hand. The constitutional rights of a person under custodial interrogation under Section 20, Article…
View On WordPress
Is it even visible? Lols blogger. I have a crappy camera, but this is the road to 260+ case digest compilation of or Constitutional Law II subject. Yeah, it is handwritten omg DPC HELP! Hahaha i can do this!!!! Wala kang choice, cheer up mo sarili mo!! I think nakakamore than 50 naman na ko. Wow HAHAHA and the deadline is on May 25. But that is the final exams week so ayoko naman sumabay pa dun diba. 😉
Conviction Is Proper Where There Was No Showing That Chain Of Custody Of The Seized Drugs Was Broken..
Conviction Is Proper Where There Was No Showing That Chain Of Custody Of The Seized Drugs Was Broken..
The Case:
Despite his defense of denial and frame-up, the RTC convicted Rustico of violation of Sec. 5 Article II of RA 9165, ruling that he prosecution successfully established the elements of illegal sale of dangerous drugs as accused- appellant was caught in flagrante delicto in a valid buy-bust operation.
On appeal, the CA affirmed the conviction. It ruled that the apprehending officers…
View On WordPress