seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Guatemala
seen from Malaysia
seen from Switzerland
seen from Lithuania
seen from Switzerland
seen from Lithuania
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from China
seen from United States
//09.16.2019//
✨LAW SCHOOL TIP✨
A key to understanding a case is understanding the facts. My contracts professor advised us to create a timeline of each case in order to clearly see when an offer and the accepted is made ((if it even is made to begin with 😅)).
He constantly reminds us:
offer + acceptance = contract
If only it were that simple!
Do you have any study tips for understanding cases?? Let me know!
Happy Studying,
Pinnacle-Studies 🌻
10:30PM and still chugging through my homework for the weekend. Next up, a case brief for my Legal Research & Writing class. I like to highlight the different aspects of the case in different colors. Green for facts, blue for the rule of law, yellow for reasoning, pink for holding, purple for judgment, and orange for dissents. How do you like to organize your briefs?
4 weeks down!
I’ve officially been a law student for four weeks, have read hundreds of pages, made dozens of case briefs, and have survived being cold called. Status: surviving and aiming to thrive!
Coffee and case briefs on a rainy Maine morning
Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan (GR. NO. 172035) Since a pre-suspension hearing is basically a due process requirement, when an accused public official is given an adequate opportunity to be heard on his possible defenses against the mandatory suspension under R.A.
Villareal vs. People (GR. No. 151258) In light of the finding of violation of the right of Escalona et al. to speedy trial, the CA’s dismissal of the criminal case against them amounted to an acquittal, and that any appeal or reconsideration thereof would result in a violation of their right against double jeopardy.
People vs. Lara (G.R. No. 199877)
People vs. Lara (G.R. No. 199877)
The right to be assisted by counsel attaches only during custodial investigation and cannot be claimed by the accused during identification in a police line-up because it is not part of the custodial investigation process. This is because during a police line-up, the process has not yet shifted from the investigatory to the accusatory and it is usually the witness or the complainant who is…
View On WordPress
People vs. Ayson
It is clear from the undisputed facts of this case that Felipe Ramos was not in any sense under custodial interrogation, as the term should be properly understood, prior to and during the administrative inquiry into the discovered irregularities in ticket sales in which he appeared to have had a hand. The constitutional rights of a person under custodial interrogation under Section 20, Article…
View On WordPress
