So on Friday the Director of the CDC Rochelle Walensky said,
“The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least 4 comorbidities. So really these are people who were unwell to begin with, and yes, really encouraging news in the context of Omicron.”
There have been plenty of people who have explained why it is dangerous for the head of the nation’s top medical authority to spout eugenics rhetoric. If you want to read more on the topic, look up Matthew Cortland or Imani Barbarin on Twitter for more info.
What I want to talk about is the way Walensky used “science-speak” in this interview to obfuscate the truth.
Example 1: “At least four comorbidities”
People not in healthcare will think: “Wow, four comorbidities. It must only be the really sickly that are dying, huh?” But here’s the thing: if you have one health condition, you probably have multiple. For example, if you have diabetes, you probably have high blood pressure and heart issues too. Given how common it is for health issues to go undiagnosed (especially in America’s healthcare hell), many people are in this 4+ category and don’t realize it.
Example 2: “Unwell to begin with”
This is technically true: people with health issues are generally “unwell.” But unwell is a humongous category, covering everybody from Hypertensive Harry to Leukemia Larry. Most of these “unwell” people were far from death (and even the ones that were close to dying don’t deserve to pass away on a ventilator.)
Put another way: If you set Ashley’s house on fire, you don’t get to say that her asthma killed her. Yes, her asthma may have caused her to suffocate a little quicker, but the fire is what killed her. If the fire hadn’t happened, she would have lived a long, happy life. A preventable pandemic is as unnatural a death as arson.
Example 3: “The vast majority of people are not contagious after 5 days”
This half-truth actually came a little earlier in the interview. The news anchor was asking Walensky about the CDC’s decision to shorten the quarantine period, and Walensky responded that it was fine since most people aren’t contagious after 5 days.
If someone says “vast majority” and avoids giving you an exact percentage, that is often a red flag. In this case, the “vast majority” means 70%. As in, nearly a third of people are contagious beyond 5 days. But Walensky says that testing after day five is an “optional,” “extra” step.
Apparently it is more important for people to go back to work than it is to curb the spread. And before you say anything about the shortage of health care workers: if these were solely intended as triage guidelines, then the CDC would have put them on the triage page of their website. These guidelines were meant for all workers, regardless of risk.
Tl;dr: The CDC Director should resign because she is damaging public trust in science during a time when we need it most.