ICYMI: Free Case Review Car Crash, Court Case: What to Know About Civil Suits https://tortadvisor.com/auto-accident-civil-suit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Germany

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Germany
ICYMI: Free Case Review Car Crash, Court Case: What to Know About Civil Suits https://tortadvisor.com/auto-accident-civil-suit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now
Free Case Review Car Crash, Court Case: What to Know About Civil Suits https://tortadvisor.com/auto-accident-civil-suit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now
𝐋𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐒𝐮𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐒𝐞𝐥𝐥.
For further information, refer to this Article By Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar.
CONOR MCGREGO! *IRELAND* #FIGHTER #CONORMCGREGOR #IRELAND #MMAFIGHTER #D...
CONOR MCGREGO! *IRELAND* #FIGHTER #CONORMCGREGOR #IRELAND #MMAFIGHTER #DUBLIN #CIVILSUIT #CELEBRITY
‘How the Lucknow High Court Upheld the Son’s Claim in a Joint Family Property Dispute: A Landmark Judgement for Inheritance Law’
Saurabh Gupta v. Smt. Archana Gupta & 2 others
FAFO 321/2023
Before Lucknow High Court
Heard by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal J
Order
The Court allowed the Injunction application of the appellant restraining respondents from transferring the property in dispute during the pendency of the Civil Suit before Civil Judge Hardoi.
The Court observed that the Court below, while passing the order has not applied his mind despite being a prima facie case, and in such a case protection is necessary against further transferring the property or changing the nature of same, if same is not protected, there are chances the property may be transferred or nature of property may be changed in that case even if the appellant's suit is decreed, then he will suffer irreparable loss and injury.
Background
Present appeal has been filed against the order passed by Civil Judge (S.D.), Hardoi on July25, 2023 in Civil Suit ‘Saurabh Gupta vs Smt. Archna Gupta and others’.
The temporary injunction application was filed by the appellant from restraining the respondent No.1 to transfer the same was rejected.
Facts:
Appellant-Sourabh Gupta filed a Civil Suit for a declaration that he is the co-sharer of 1/4th part of the property in dispute as the property belongs to joint family property because it was purchased by the father of the appellant in the name of his wife Smt Archana Gupta -the respondent no.1.
Respondent no.1 is the house maker and did not have any independent source of income.
The appellant's father purchased the property in dispute from Ram Ratan Gupta on 20.10.86.
The appellant had made construction over that plot, and thereafter, the entire family has been running a business therein, and this complex is also known as R.C. Complex.
In the written statement, respondents have stated that the aforesaid property has been gifted by respondent no.1 to respondent no.2.
Submission of the Counsel of the Appellant
Respondent No.1-Archana Gupta is a homemaker and did not have any independent income, and his father purchased the property in dispute in the name of respondent no.1 (wife), therefore property belongs to the joint family property and not an individual property of the respondent.
Appellant and Respondent no.2, have been jointly running a business on the property.
In the gift deed, respondent no.1 admitted that she is homemaker.
Had she been a working woman she would not have mentioned herself as a homemaker.
Case for granting injunction has not considered by the Court below.
Being joint family property, the appellant is entitled to 1/4 share in the property in dispute, therefore his right should be protected by restraining the respondents from creating any 3rd party's right
Submission of the Counsel of the Respondents
The application u/order 39Rule 1 & 2 is not maintainable as no final relief was claimed in the plaint, which is in nature of permanent injunction.
Observation of the Court
The father of the appellant & husband of Respondent No.1 had purchased the property in the dispute.
There is nothing on record to show that respondent had any independent source of income.
Once a property is purchased by a Hindu husband in the name of his wife, who is homemaker, then the property will be deemed to be purchased by the husband himself from his source unless the contrary is proved.
An application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. is maintainable for the protection of property, If the Court finds protection of the subject matter is necessary, and if protection is not granted, the same may result in irreparable loss to the complainant.
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, Section 29(b)(iii) prescribes that if the husband purchased the property in the name of his wife or children, then the same will not be said to be Benami property but will be deemed to be purchased by the husband out of his source.
Grant of a temporary injunction is governed by three basic principles, i.e. prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury, which must be considered in a proper perspective in the facts and circumstances of the particular case. (Zenith Metaplast Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharastra and others; 2009 (10) SCC 388)
The appellant is claiming the declaration of only 1⁄4th share in the property in dispute on the ground that the property belongs to a joint Hindu family.
This Court under Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act may presume the existence of fact that the property purchased by Hindu husband in the name of his spouse, will be the property of family, because in common course of natural event Hindu husband purchases a property in the name of his wife, who is homemaker and does not have any source of income for the benefit of family.
The property is joint Hindu family property and protection of property from transferring to a third party is necessary.
Seema Bhatnagar
#illegaltermination #civilsuit #law #jurisdiction #servicelawyers #legal #labourcourt #legaladvisor #updates https://www.instagram.com/p/CpJwPVjv0Fv/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
Introduction “How to file a Civil Suit” Filing a civil suit in India can be a complex and time-consuming process. It is important to understand the legal process and the various steps involved in filing a civil suit in India. This guide will provide an overview of the process, including the necessary documents, the court […]
How to file a Civil Suit in India?
Redemption! Kanye' West! Celebrity legal troubles! Shopping! Pet Peeves and more!