#coolpixiekid

[blvckphrodite]

coolpixiekid said: bc he’s a sweetheart

tru and i love it

[body-haver]

i scrolled past that recent post at the Humplay auditions and Cecelia recognized ur muscles

aww that's pretty great ! 

[lesbean-phasma]

so you're just going to continue siding with terfs and transphobes over multiple actual trans people on whether something is cissexist.... all right cool, that speaks for itself.

"so you’re just going to continue siding with misogynists and homophobes over multiple actual female women on whether something is misogynistic…. alright cool, that speaks for itself"

see how easy that is? it goes both ways.

you refuse to accept any misogyny on your part (no matter how much proof I give, none of which you’ve addressed btw) and demand we accept that it is cissexist without any actual proof beyond “I said so” (yet you would flip your shit if we pulled the same thing with you. if we can’t say “it’s misogynistic cause I say so” and be believed, neither can you)

but I’m the horrible bigot because I dare to agree with the evil TERFs on something.

and the fact that you refuse to listen to women with vaginas who tell you ya’lls actions regarding vaginas is misogynistic speaks volumes.

scare tactics, gas lighting, and “cause I said so” don’t work here. painting me as an evil TERF because ya’ll fucked up is fooling no one.

besides, last night I saw someone (one of the people on your side) literally say wanting to give oral sex to a woman with a vagina in and of itself is transphobic, so forgive me for not taking all these “actual trans people” seriously with your claims. (not to mention I also saw multiple trans and NB people calling ya’ll out on your misogyny too. you gonna go call them transphobic TERFs too, or just me?)

if you want me to believe you, you better bring some actual proof and logic to the table and actually rebut points without resorting to your childish scare tactics

otherwise just give it up. ya’ll fucked up and we all know it. give it a rest and wipe the egg off your face already.

(*edit, I just saw a little post you made which says “the moment you decide you know better than marginalized people what should and shouldn’t offend them is the moment you cease to be credible”

so, according to you, women and lesbians are no longer marginalized, and you somehow don’t notice you are doing the exact same thing you’ve accused me of. you’ve decided you know better than a woman with a vagina what is and is not offensive to us regarding our vaginas.

and another I can do with the response you sent me here. “life advice: when multiple trans people are telling you something is cissexist and you disagree, the trans people are probably right” - “life advice: when multiple women are telling you something is misogynistic and you disagree, the women are probably right”

but go ahead, keep telling yourself I’m the horrible bigot who refuses to listen to minorities. whatever helps you sleep at night)

[lesbean-phasma]

she deleted the post because TERFs were hounding her blog, which are the people on your side right now btw

oh no, how horrible, I agree with a TERF on something?

better not support gay marriage ether cause Dan Savage supports it

or be against porn cause so are super-conservative christians

or hate rape cause those horrible TERFs hate that too

cause ya know, two groups with apposing beliefs can’t have common interests and goals

people with beliefs you disagree with can’t possibly agree on anything, people you disagree with are 100% evil and have no possible good goals or intentions

how shocking, people (even TERFs) are multi dimensional people with different opinions on different things that line up differently with everyone else, even those without the same groups believe slightly different things

it’s almost like people are individuals or something

and all snark aside, that’s not much of a threat, cause by how TERF is defined now, I’m a TERF simply for disagreeing with you two, so that’s not exactly upsetting.

[lesbean-phasma]

thespectreofwomanhood never told OP that it was wrong to be sexually attracted to only vaginas, she literally just said "i like this joke but i wish it weren't cissexist" because the joke itself equated a gender with a set of genitals. she didn't say anything about vaginas or even get angry about it, and you're reaching far as hell to tell her she's misogynistic for being disappointed with the way a joke was phrased.

I’m aware of that.

I know what was said, and it was wrong.

no where did it equate vagina with woman other than mention that the particular individual described is a woman with one, as are 90% of women.

if you find that to be cissexist and can’t stand women being mentioned with vaginas, you’re a misogynist.

and actually, the post I linked to (that has now been deleted) in my original response did. their solution was to remove all mentions of vaginas (“spell out GAL PALS when you go down on her”). according to them, this is how you make it not cissexist.

their entire problem with the post was the mention of vaginas in a lesbian sexual encounter

that is misogyny

I don’t have to reach for anything. they all but said it outright.

and the fact that it’s all been deleted says everything

admit ya’ll fucked up and move on. it’s not that hard.

[lesbean-phasma]

hey maybe instead of telling a trans woman how misogynistic she is you should consider that it is, in fact, cissexist to equate lesbianism entirely with vaginas

but that wasn’t done. they (if this is who I think this is referring to I’m pretty sure they was the pronouns listed in the sidebar, before you get pissed off at me not using she) said the joke about the infinitely changing reader giving oral sex to a woman with a vagina

this can be two women with natural vaginas, one with a natural vagina one without, or one with any kind of vagina and one with a penis. it is whatever the reader decides they want it to be

and the OP literally only said she only wants to be sexual with women with vaginas (went on to explain that she can only physically become aroused by vaginas and is only attracted to women, even though she agrees that not all women have vaginas)

regardless of how I feel about lesbianism being equated with vaginas only, that’s not even close to what actually happened

however, your little friend was point blank extremely misogynistic and ran from that instead of addressing it and apologizing

I suggest you focus on the actual problem at hand, and stop telling a lesbian how to define lesbianism

[shnerk]

coolpixiekid said: i agree but i’m assuming OP is a freshman who thinks the position is a totally different thing than what it is

Yeah, that's my next favorite option. Still kinda mad, though. I don't appreciate it when people come into RR spaces to bitch about groups of people, especially if they have no idea what they're talking about. OP might be ignorant but they're still being a big ol jerk and I'm grumpy. :<