Sweet jesus - here's the full article, its actually worse than the headline makes you think: https://archive.li/OyO7H

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Mali
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States
Sweet jesus - here's the full article, its actually worse than the headline makes you think: https://archive.li/OyO7H
JK Rowling was hit once more by claims of "transphobia" as part of a "long-term campaign" by activist groups to "smear" people who have alternative beliefs about gender.
Hahaha
Many gender clinicians now recommend transgender kids as young as three be allowed to live publicly as the gender they identity with, even though studies have shown most kids won't stay transgender as they grow older.
Remember that old saying that "If a headline asks a question, the answer is invariably no?" - well - here its yes, and the writer of this article is a lunatic for implying otherwise
Can’t have the press stepping out of its SJW cordon, can we?
magical
the finest in clickbait
Are you a person, place or thing? We have good news.
This is NOT an opinion article
this is from their Style section - so New York Times seems to think that this is actual fucking news.
As Jordan Peterson noted when he tweeted about this article:
"But what’s the difference between an aesthetic and an identity anyway?". Nothing, if you're a reporter from the NY Times.
archive version of the article, in case it gets paywalled: https://archive.md/nTkfD
Washington Post printed an article IN DEFENCE of the Taliban having access to Twitter - while also arguing that its still good that Trump is banned from Twitter
fucking hell