Mar 16
AYER
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Bulgaria
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
AYER
About $libra...
The argument that the president bears no responsibility because the crypto promotion happened “outside of working hours” is, at best, indefensible.
It doesn’t matter if it was on a Sunday, at home, or abroad—the post was made from his official, verified account, which is regularly used to communicate decisions, positions, and actions tied to his presidential role. That account is not personal, and anything shared through it cannot be separated from his public office. Suggesting that the presidency operates on a 9-to-5 schedule is a complete misunderstanding of the continuous nature of political representation.
The distinction between “sharing” and “promoting” also collapses in this context. That nuance might apply in ordinary situations, but when the country’s head of state shares something, the line becomes irrelevant.
A mere mention from the president implies endorsement. It builds public trust, attracts investment or interest, and gives legitimacy to whatever is being promoted. It’s even more serious when it comes to private ventures, because public officials are expressly prohibited from using their position to benefit private actors. This isn’t up for debate.
In addition, there are photographs of the president with individuals involved in the crypto project, suggesting at least some prior connection. This undermines the notion of an isolated or accidental gesture and strengthens the case for a serious inquiry into his involvement.
Did he know it was a potential scam?
That may be hard to prove. But the rhetorical contortions used to dodge responsibility only raise more questions. And ultimately, intent is not the only issue. The president is an economist, has experience in the crypto world, and should be held to a higher standard of diligence.
If he didn’t know, he should have known.
He’s not just any citizen—he’s the head of state.
Arguments this weak might work in Congress, where political alliances often outweigh logic and public ethics. But the public shouldn't be expected to accept this kind of hollow justification. Not even those who support his political space should stand behind this.
The president embodies the government and represents the state. He has a duty to understand the weight of his actions and to act responsibly. We cannot afford to expect—or accept—anything less.
Photo: Javier Milei, President of the Argentine Republic, alongside Hayden Mark Davis, alleged founder of $libra.
$LIBRA: quién es Orlando Rodolfo Mellino, el “jubilado” que recibió un millón de dólares de Hayden Davis
EL ESCÁNDALO QUE MILEI QUIERE TAPAR (PARTE II): Taiano avaló liberar bienes de los implicados en $LIBRA mientras su hijo les sigue facturando
La billetera “Milei” volvió a moverse: nuevos retiros en el caso $LIBRA reavivan el escándalo financiero que incomoda al gobierno
Los bolsos de Novelli, la reunión con Karina y el engranaje oculto de la criptoestafa $Libra
NUEVAS PRUEBAS SOBRE $LIBRA: la criptoestafa que conecta a Milei con una red de lavado internacional
La impunidad también se tokeniza: De Giorgi congela la causa $LIBRA y blinda al entorno de Milei