This is just blatant misinformation, by the way. What this person is calling "agenitalia" is a type of ambiguous genitalia by itself- these "agenital variations" ARE ambiguous genitalia and often are classified as such when discussed in academic contexts. "Agenital" people have ambiguous genitalia because ambiguous genitalia has never meant "in between a penis and vagina" until people decided to fully misinterpret what "ambiguous" means, based off of intersexist stereotypes. Ambiguous genitalia is simply when ones genitalia does not appear fully "male" (complete testicles and phallus) or "female" (complete vagina and clitoris)- there is no definition of ambiguous genitalia that has ever excluded so-called "agenital" variations until recently, and it's a very anti-science view to claim that "agenital" and ambiguous genitalia are two different categories and that not all agenital people have ambiguous genitalia. The idea that ambiguous genitalia must mean "in between male and female" comes from the intersexist myth that intersex people are a "mix of" or "between" male and female, and I cannot believe it is still being perpetuated by so-called "intersex activists" across Tumblr.
Again, this is another reason why agenital as a term needs to be retired when referring to certain genital setups or variations- it is fundamentally based on a misunderstanding of how genitalia is classified and how ambiguous genitalia works. Not only is it intersexist towards people who are classified as "agenital" under that system, it also is based in a much more well-known form of intersex fetishism and intersexism, the idea that intersex genitalia = male and female.












