Sunset from Eagle Crest Resort

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Malaysia

seen from Switzerland

seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Panama
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Guatemala
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Tunisia
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
Sunset from Eagle Crest Resort
Energy companies are scrambling to build 'pumped storage' projects to complement solar and wind farms. Environmentalists are concerned.
Over the past three or four years, I’ve posted links to several articles and essays and op-ed pieces about this hydropower plant proposed on the edge of Joshua Tree National Park. It’s called Eagle Crest or Eagle Mountain. What do you think of sucking out billions of gallons of water from an ancient aquifer beneath a desert that supplies water to numerous springs that support wildlife? The threat to Joshua Tree National Park and other adjacent wilderness lands can only be awful. In the right place, with the right ecosystem, pumped storage is a good water to generate clean energy. But in the desert? Don’t think so.
Excerpt from this story from the LA Times:
Steve Lowe gazed into a gaping pit in the heart of the California desert, careful not to let the blistering wind send him toppling over the edge.
The pit was a bustling iron mine once, churning out ore that was shipped by rail to a nearby Kaiser Steel plant. When steel manufacturing declined, Los Angeles County tried to turn the abandoned mine into a massive landfill. Conservationists hope the area will someday become part of Joshua Tree National Park, which surrounds it on three sides.
Lowe has a radically different vision.
With backing from NextEra Energy — the world’s largest operator of solar and wind farms — he’s working to fill two mining pits with billions of gallons of water, creating a gigantic “pumped storage” plant that he says would help California get more of its power from renewable sources, and less from fossil fuels.
Lowe’s project, known as Eagle Mountain, is no outlier. Across the country, companies are scrambling to build similar facilities to complement solar and wind farms.
Those plans are brushing up against concerns from environmentalists, who love solar and wind but usually oppose building new dams, a feature of many pumped storage projects. Critics have said some of the proposed facilities would flood scenic canyons, interrupt free-flowing stretches of river and harm fish and wildlife.
At Eagle Mountain, one of several abandoned mining pits would be filled with water, pumped from beneath the ground. When nearby solar farms flood the power grid with cheap electricity, Lowe’s company would use that energy — which might otherwise go to waste — to pump water uphill, to a higher pit.
When there’s not enough solar power on the grid — after sundown, or perhaps after several days of cloudy weather — the water would be allowed to flow back down to the lower pit by gravity, passing through an underground powerhouse and generating electricity.
The Eagle Mountain plant wouldn’t interrupt any rivers or destroy a pristine landscape. But environmentalists say the $2.5-billion facility would pull too much water from the ground in one of the driest parts of California, and prolong a history of industrialization just a few miles from one of America’s most visited national parks.
Lowe rejects those arguments, saying his proposal has survived round after round of environmental review and would only drain a tiny fraction of the underground aquifer.The project’s fate may hinge on a question with no easy answer: How much environmental sacrifice is acceptable — or even necessary — in the fight against climate change?
Stopped at this spot once more. This time with sleds.
“You guys are crazy”
Alaska Maddie
Nike has really made some great scenes.
We could go down the side of the mountain.
Tiny people over there.