Sure sucks when someone doesn't tell you what's going on, eh Deaner?

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from Italy
seen from Canada
seen from United States
Sure sucks when someone doesn't tell you what's going on, eh Deaner?
Stumbled across this post by @saskboy expressing his displeasure with the speed at which the robocalls investigation is playing out. From the post [emphasis his]:
A report to Parliament a full two years after a serious crime that calls the legitimacy of our government into question? What priority is higher than determining our lawmakers are legitimately elected?
In some ways, I wish us Guelphicans weren't ground zero so Elections Canada could "investigate" a riding where the Liberals aren't as safe as a Kennedy in Massachusetts, but that might be too close to actually solving a problem.
My greatest fear is when it's all said and done, they'll prove what everybody's suspected (or known, in some cases) all along and some token 5-digit fine will be levied against the CPC. But I tend to be cynical.
"I hope they find some reassurance that some of the checks and balances are working," he said, pointing the court case that overturned the election of Conservative MP Ted Opitz
Yes, those completely unrelated checks and balances in one riding vs. the many robocalled ridings. My faith is ^not restored.