Thematically appropriate comic for Make a Terrible Comic Day!!
I saw the original post this morning and it made me get out of bed to make something, so thank u Pseudonym Jones mission accomplished

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Finland
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from France
seen from China
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
Thematically appropriate comic for Make a Terrible Comic Day!!
I saw the original post this morning and it made me get out of bed to make something, so thank u Pseudonym Jones mission accomplished
Accusing people of being pro-death penalty because they like a certain comic book character... hmmm that's certainly a thought that someone could have
“if you’re a ___ fan you’re disgusting”
there’s a difference between appreciating a character and relating to the character. like having a favorite batman villain, they’re all murderers, but which one is the most engaging? which one is the most interesting to see engage with the protagonist?
y’all jump slade and sabertooth but treat the joker like jesus.
and the same argument can be applied to joker fans (even tho they lowk a lil embarrassing) if you find a character interesting that is ENOUGH to say that you like them, because they are FICTIONAL. and you should like characters as you like FICTION. and it makes me genuinely. concerned with how some of y’all engage with art.
sabertooth is an interesting and engaging character,
with flaws that outweigh everything else, and i really love storylines with him! shoot me! hes a really engaging villain and is genuinely terrifying!! same with slade, michal bell, negan! you see it everywhere in fiction and the approach of liking a fictional character under the same criteria as liking a boyfriend is NOT NORMAL!
you’re allowed to appreciate a good villain, but at the end of the day it’s literally just a story- it’s either entertaining for you or it’s not, and that doesn’t say anything about your morals. (hope this makes sense)
idk if i agree with you. Lobdell created Isabel and made it so that Jason really cared about her and brought her back after Tynion made it so they'd split for good. imo if Lobdell has it his way Jason and Isabel will end up lasting a while and probably just had jartemis for a couple issues to please the fans. i could be wrong, but he actually seems to be giving her a personality and making her a character that will end up staying and i've actually grown to like her over these 2 issues + preview
You are all welcome (and even encouraged) to disagree with me. Any predictions I make are obviously just my guesses. I think they’re based on a pretty solid understanding of the impermanence of everything in comics. But they are ultimately just suspicions and no matter how confident I am with them, I’m never exactly surprised when I’m ‘wrong’ either. I generally rank my predictions as, especially in comics, there’s so many different narrative directions things can go that it’d be silly to be convinced that this thing I think is going to happen is the only possible outcome. I just usually only share my top one or two expectations.
And… also… what I suspect will happen is often very different from what I want to happen. I don’t expect Lobdell to ever bring Rose into the Outlaws–regardless of whether he can use her or not–unless DC makes him (no matter how obvious it is). He got rid of Biz and Artemis the second he was allowed to because they aren’t his creations and he doesn’t get money from their usage.
But regarding the rest of you comment…
Isabel is definitely Lobdell’s baby and I think you’re right, if Lobdell gets his way they’ll last a while*. But 1) Lobdell doesn’t necessarily get his way. He wanted to keep Jason and Artemis platonic (a decision I wholeheartedly agreed with). But his bosses disagreed and he lost, 2) Even though it seems like Lobdell will write RH forever, he won’t. I’m not much of a gambler, but I’d bet a whole $5 that, if Isabel lasts until the new writer (which is a bet I would absolutely not take, even if Lobdell only writes RH for another year I’d be surprised if editorial allowed her to last that long**), she’ll be one of the first things to go, 3) Giving a character personality and purpose is… default settings? writing 101? bare minimum? Plenty of well developed comics characters die, switch sides, disappear… Just because Isabel is… being written? is a recurring character? doesn’t mean she gets to stick around indefinitely.
Also, I can’t help but note that even you said you think she’ll last “a while” which is acknowledging that she’s unlikely to last forever. That’s pretty much all I said. Is that it won’t last (I don’t expect it to last more than 10 issues but concede that it could last for a year give or take). And that if we’re lucky they’ll split fairly amicably and be able to rekindle later when someone who agrees with Lobdell that Isabel is Jason’s Lois writes the book or someone who wants to use the past relationship for emotional fodder.
That’s what I mean by impermanence. The side characters are on a conveyor belt that runs through a revolving door. Even the best established legacy romances cycle out.
Dick really cared about Babs. Dick really cared about Kori.
Tim really cares about Steph.
Bruce really cares about Selina. And Talia.
Clark and Lois are the closest to a permanent couple in superhero comics and even they get periodic breaks to put them with different people.
Such is the nature of indefinite serialized narratives that don’t have generational progression.
*The longer Jason/Isabel last, the more likely it is that she is seen as Jason’s Lois and Lobdell can get royalties when future writers inevitably use her, which is probably why Essence is coming back, to double down on love interests who will act as some kind of foil for each other. Before Lobdell Jason had no love interests so he’s gonna make sure that the best established ones are his. Most writers favor their own characters. But few are as insistent about it as Lobdell. So, yes, I agree with you that he’ll try to keep her around as long as possible. It seems we differ on how long editorial will let her stick around. Because…
**Romantic relationships in comics are viewed as weights holding the characters down. That might seem stupid. And that’s because it inherently is. The only way that logic holds up is if it’s standing on the shoulders of another stupid principle so deeply rooted in the foundations of modern comics that it regularly makes me think about quitting the medium altogether. The divine edict to maintain the status quo at all costs. Romantic relationships grow stale, annoying, frustrating when the characters aren’t allowed to grow. If Batman and Catwoman are forced to remain static caricatures of people, they can only have so many arguments about their different ideologies before it feels like we’re stuck watching a bad gif for too long. When DC feels like we’ve hit that point, Batman and Catwoman break up and suddenly Talia is trying to be a good guy and the process starts over again.
Hoo boy, that was much longer than I meant it to be.
I wish I could read things with people the same way I watch things with people. Like book club style is not enough I need someone to sit with me and look over the same book page by page and we can comment on it together
i never know what size to make art im like... well... well it needs to be long?