may our salty and cunty internet asses find merriment and joy
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from New Zealand

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Türkiye
may our salty and cunty internet asses find merriment and joy
because I suck at being concise
my tweet this morning:
as dumb as it is they're not lying when they say stovens' celebrity-ness is quickly growing in the states
and then I was busy at a meeting and then found I'd gotten more responses to it than I'd expected so this is me trying to clarify and respond back and using tumblr instead of twitter replies because I can be touchy with my tweets/tweet count. also keep in mind that I had a much-weirder-than-normal night and tweeted that just ten minutes after I woke up. that's not a legitimate excuse now that I'm writing this but whatever.
As it's twitter with 140 characters and I wasn't bothered to try to include everything I was thinking in one tweet with the few minutes I had I didn't include that his celebrity status is growing, even though it's not at all A-list. And my definition of celebrity is probably much looser and more superficial in that no, nobody really knows him outside of Downton and yes, if you mentioned his name randomly they would ask "who?" and you'd have to clarify "Matthew from Downton Abbey" but in what I've seen, isn't that kind of thing the same for a lot of other celebrities? especially TV ones. I guess some of you wouldn't call them celebrities either. Which brings me back to me having a looser definition. Also I'm around teenage girls a lot who have fangirling tendencies and for me, somebody who has enough status to have people like him like that is celebrity enough.
Like I agree with all your responses but I don't see how all that has to be exclusive to whether or not you're a celebrity. And I did say "quickly growing" not that he is a great celebrity because getting more well known because of Downton and various sparse media is still becoming more well known. so I stand with my original point, they're not lying.
crap I just blew this up more didn't I. oh well. arguments are good. even if I suck at them as you can probably tell.
19. do i know ur middle name????
NO ONE WILL KNOW!!!!!!! EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
evadelectorskayas replied to your photo: Okay, so I’m not even trying to be mean, but every...
I’ve never been a part of a show where the fandom is so resistant to watching it as its meant to be watched idk
Same. I mean, I understand if your favorite character on a show isn’t the main character--we’ve all been there. But part of stanning an auxiliary character means that you take what you get, and learn not to expect too much. I mean, Downton’s like the only show I know where stans of minor characters get legitimately ENRAGED that at givens like less screentime and lack of magazine covers and promo focus. Are you serious? Who are these people? I actually like them, but I mean, a TV Guide cover of like, Mrs. Hughes and Mrs. Patmore is neither going to sell magazines nor promote the Christmas special to casual fans.
evadelectorskayas replied to your quote: I think there’s some great writing being done in...
Lets recast Matthew with Cate
All I'm picturing now is a Downton/ I'm Not There crossover.
Mary: Don't you see what this means?
"Matthew": Yeah, it's chaos, it's clocks, it's watermelons, it's everything.
Mary: It means that deep down you're not on our side.