#evaping

[houseofvapor-blog]

Authentic Vape Liquids - HouseofVapor

HOUSE OF VAPOR mission is to craft a widespread vaping culture in India, and to make the nation tobacco free, thus saving millions of lives. Visit here:- https://houseofvapor.in

[houseofvapor-blog]

Chances are you must be a smoker that brought you towards the world of vaping . Vaping must have enthralled you at some point or the othe...

[houseofvapor-blog]

Top 9 benefits of vaping and how you can avoid smoking

Vaping has gained a lot of popularity which means that we are going to see more of a generation vaping instead smoking. Vaping has many…

[vapourdepot-blog]

Gator Vapes Raspberry Riot Gator Vapes Raspberry Riot: A super ripe raspberry and fresh tea combo, this vapes clean and crispy. Flavour Profile: Raspberry, Tea Bottle Size: 4 x 10ml Pack Mix Ratio: 70VG 30PG

[wyldeside]

Reports of high levels of a potentially deadly chemical in e-cigarettes have been greatly exaggerated and are part of a trend toward the demonization of vaping, according to a leading tobacco control expert. Diacetyl, a chemical linked to the severe respiratory disease bronchiolitis obliterans, commonly known as “popcorn lung,” was found in 39 of 51 flavored e-liquids examined by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Media outlets across the world ran with headlines pumping up the risks of e-cigarettes, such as “Vaping Could Give You ‘Popcorn Lung‘” and “E-cigarettes linked to incurable lung disease.” But according to Dr. Michael Siegel, a Professor in the Department of Community Health Sciences at Boston University School of Public Health, the Harvard study has several “glaring omissions,” and the level of diacetyl exposure from vaping compared with smoking differs by “orders of magnitude.” Siegel, who has spent 25 years in the field of tobacco control, pointed out the study published in the journal “Environmental Health Perspectives” didn’t mention that regular cigarettes contain diacetyl, and in far greater amounts than any e-liquids. Looking at the numbers, Siegel found “daily exposure to diacetyl from smoking is therefore 750 times higher, on average than exposure to diacetyl from vaping.” Vapers are, on average, exposed to a daily dose of nine micrograms of diacetyl, compared with 6,718 micrograms for smokers. But the evidence gets worse for sensationalist headline writers and anti-vaping activists. “The ‘worst’ e-cigarette tested produces diacetyl exposure that is 85 times lower than that of the ‘worst’ cigarette tested,” Siegel wrote. The e-cigarette liquid with the highest level of diacetyl in the Harvard study exposed vapers to 239 micrograms against 20,340 micrograms for heavy smokers. Bronchiolitis obliterans is known as “popcorn lung” because it was identified in workers who inhaled the artificial butter flavor used to make microwavable popcorn. Some cases of popcorn lung have been so damaging that patients have required a lung transplant. But vapers have little reason to worry about the relatively trivial levels of diacetyl in e-cigarettes compared to tobacco cigarettes. Not only is the risk of diacetyl exposure far lower for vapers than for smokers, but according to Critical Reviews in Toxicology, “smoking has not been shown to be a risk factor for bronchiolitis (popcorn lung).” Speaking to the Daily Caller News Foundation, Siegel explained the reaction to the Harvard study and what it says about the public health movement’s stance on vaping and the media’s reporting of e-cigarette research. “There’s a lot of effort out there to demonize electronic cigarettes and a lot of research attempting to identify the risk, which is fine, we need to know what the risks are, but the reporting of the research I think has been very biased,” said Siegel. “What this really does is undermine the public’s appreciation of how severe the risks of smoking is. What it’s basically telling ex-smokers who’ve quit, using e-cigarettes, is you might as well go back to smoking.”

[wyldeside]

I keep reading warnings, many by the uneducated masses of parrots populating the green face of the Earth and some by the supposedly educated, medical professionals of the world, which impress upon those being warned that the liquid used in E-cigarettes is also used in antifreeze, making it extremely toxic to human beings… and animals, too, allegedly.  The truth, of course, is both more complicated and simpler than the lies and misconceptions surrounding this volatile, semi-political topic based on the rising popularity of electronic cigarettes, purported to be a healthy alternative to “real” (analog) tobacco products.  This antifreeze scare is nothing new.  The most vehement of the anti-smoking gang (the ones who think anything cylindrical, brought to the mouth on a regular basis is a gateway drug to Marlboro Reds) immediately leapt upon the jugular of the first E-cigarettes to hit the First World and disected their ingredients until they found something, anything, that could be used to demonize them to the public who, ironically, were looking for a different way to quit smoking.  They found that one of the main ingredients in E-liquid was polyethylene glycol, which is used in antifreeze and is fairly toxic to humans in large quantities.  The E-cigarette industry answered by changing that ingredient to propylene glycol, a much safer alternative.  In fact, although propylene glycol (or PG) is used in antifreeze as well, it’s only used in RV and Marine antifreeze, colored pink to designate it’s non-toxic qualities.  Hence the picture above. Here are a few facts about polyethylene glycol (the somewhat dangerous one): Polyethylene glycol is, in fact, used in antifreeze because it lowers the freezing temperature of water.  It produces ethylene glycol when processed. Ethylene Glycol has been known to be lethal in doses as low as 786 mg/kg.  Even the electronic cigarettes that DO utilize polyethylene glycol (PEG) come nowhere near this mark. Laboratory studies on the inhalation of vaporized/aerosolized PEG all showed that inahlation did not, in fact, deliver lethal, or even harmful, doses of PEG to laboratory animals. Antifreeze which uses PEG to lower the freezing point of water is generally dyed a blue/green color (we’ve all seen it on our driveway at one point or another) to indicate toxicity and danger. When ingested (swallowed, not inhaled) PEG is metabolised first into glycolic acid, then into oxalic acid… which is dangerous.  This danger is present in PEG, but as stated above, not enough to cause harm when vaporized. In contrast, here are some interesting points concerning propylene glycol (the harmless one): PG is metabolised by the human body into chemicals that are naturally occurring in normal, human metabolic functions.  The resulting chemicals are pyruvic and lactic acids, both of which are quite normal in our bodies. PG is listed by the Food and Drug Administration (Yeah, that’s right.  The FDA, otherwise known as the opponents to the E-cigarette industry) as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe).PG is present in some antifreeze products, but is colored pink to make it readily recognizable as non-toxic.  This type of antifreeze is often found in boats and RVs.In addition to being approved for human consumption by the FDA, PG is also approved for human inhalation by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).Last but not least in the slightest, PG’s germicidal properties has been found to promote healthier human lung function by killing many of the germs and bacteria which take root in the lungs and make us sick with respiratory illnesses.  So, in short, PG is not only harmless, it also induces a state of increased healthiness. PG is now used by the vast majority of E-juice manufacturers.  PEG was all-but-abandoned when all of this hogwash about antifreeze started causing the sheeple to panic, as they are wont to do whenever they read a headline with the form “Is _____ Really Healthy?”  As you can see by the above-mentioned evidence and scientific analyses, Neither PEG nor PG are actually unhealthy when inhaled.  Of the two, PG is slightly better, which is why most of the E-cigarette industry has switched from PEG to PG.  Of course, they also did so in an effort to shut the ANTZ (Anti-Nicotine and Tobacco Zealots) up… a move which ultimately failed because they have abandoned all attention to scientific evidence in exchange for a vendetta against the industry as a whole. Please feel free to spread this around to all the skeptics you know.  Encourage them to do more research on their own, and at the very least to read through the sources listed below.  All I ask is that you give ejuiceconnoisseur.com credit as author.  Good luck and VAPE ON!!!!

[wyldeside]

Nicotine addiction is one of the most difficult addictions to reverse and it increases not only the likelihood of later cigarette smoking, but the risks of abuse and addiction to other substances.

Dr. Samuel A. Ball on Evaping

Says the Doctor who started his day, and hundreds of previous days, with a cup of coffee. I’d like to see him quit coffee. Screaming headaches, withdrawal, etc.

Oh, and nicotine occurs naturally in a variety of vegetables and plants including Tomatoes.