#femsolid

[tomorrowwithme]

I can't stop LAUGHING 😂. They chose pictures of Apsaras and Yakshis (female nature spirits thats equivalents in Greek mythology are water and forest nymphs) and try to claim that because they're voluptuous like anime girls drawn by pervs it means that "Hinduism is misogynistic". Who's gonna tell these fuckers with no elementary knowledge of Indic sculptures and mythology how moronic they come off as? Are you gonna be mad at 2000+ year old sculptors for sculpting Apsaras, Yakshis and other SUPERNATURAL beings?

These porn brained westerners and their Indian sepoys masquerading as feminists don't even deserve a response. Our Devis have big payodhara which nurtures us like MOTHER. Apsaras and Yakshis are shaped so beautifully because they have feminine essence which was worshipped by our ancestors!!! We bow to Chamunda who has no breasts. Soon these westerners will come after Shivalinga for being chauvinistic and whatnot. Western feminists, who even pulled up cultural relativism like the mini nazis they are, fuck off and focus on your males who travel to Africa and Asia to grape kids.

[tomorrowwithme]

What's their issue with big breasts though? Women with big chests exist. Do they not realise that thinking big breasts= sexualisation/objectification of women is a misogynistic assumption by itself?

As a big-breasted woman myself them comparing apsara statues to unrealistic anime boobs- is just plain disrespectful. Honestly reminds me of the girls who bullied me during my school days.

The racism just jumps out.

I think their problem was the voluptuous figures and the position (which they mistakenly likened with the "coquettish" poses of anime girls, which definitely are drawn by misogynistic perverts) the sculptures were sculpted.

It is the tribhanga (tripple bend) position known in the Indian classical dances.

The first image is of Ardhanarishvara (Shiva and Shakti combined), and the second image is of a Yakshi from a Buddhist site.

The third image is of goddess Tara from Bali, Indonesia, enter the fourth image is of Mohini (Vishnu's female avatar)



@/femsolid and her klan's understanding is veeery surface-level and it comes from a place of ignorance. I've written a reply to her, explaining how her logic fails, and that if she really wants to make a feminist critique against Hinduism, she should choose better arguments, but she refuses to listen. There's also a hinduphobe who goes around in people's DMs masquerading as a hindu and sending abusive asks. That same anon has come to my inbox too, and I deducted that it is the same, based on the same grammatical mistakes that they make across the messages they send to different people.

Also, your point is completely valid. Can't big breasted women exist now because it's now apparently against feminism? It's a norm that Indian women are curvy. Can you imagine this @/femsolid and western feminists criticise African fertility goddess figurines for their voluptuous build? It seems that western feminists have the guts to criticise only Hindu craftsmanship in their racist drivel.

[tomorrowwithme]

this whole situation reminded me that white feminists already tried pulling this nonsense on black women yearsssssss ago by claiming that their natural bodies were enforcing patriarchal standards and those same whitefems got shut down real quick. it’s funny that they’re trying the same exact thing on desi women now but ig you can’t teach an old (racist) dog new tricks

Yess. I love that Black women clocked that out. I'm still mad at how someone can look at millennia old sculpture of another civilisation and the first thing they think is perverse things.

[femsolid]

For the last time.

No, you are not a feminist separatist if you date men. It's literally a contradiction in terms.

A separatist must 1) separate from men (duh) especially sexually and 2) value/prioritize women. That's kind of within the name, isn't it?

All this blablabla about "degrees" of separatism and ways to "practice separatism at different levels" is just a way to water it down. Especially the part about not dating men, which is the most important and defining part.

And no, reading radfem books is not what makes you a radfem. It's supposed to help you understand male supremacy and develop class consciousness. But if you're just sitting there with your books on your lap, then you have not truly understood what radical feminism is about. Because radical feminism demands actions. It's not an identity, a brand, or a club. It's a political movement. Key word here: MOVEMENT.

Once you KNOW you're supposed to get MOVING. If you truly develop class consciousness then you're naturally going to get moving towards liberation. If you find yourself looking for excuses to do little to nothing, then you still think through the male prism and lack class consciousness.

[tomorrowwithme]

O Anon, after stalking my account since April (you know, when the Pahalgam massacre happened, from which point on I've vocally started to speak up against Hinduphobia), you've stalked and harassed me on my inbox along with your other anon friends. you've been sending me suggestive messages, masquerading as a Hindu just so that you could "prove" to Tumblr that I am a Hindutva. And now you're sending anon asks to someone whom I was countering, brown nosing her and acting like a victim. Just FYI, every accusation by you is an admission. I don't send anons. If I have to send something, then I will do it openly with this blog.

And that idiot sepoy gunga din indian aunt Jemima, how does it feel to glaze a French bonjour baguette camembert who's benefitting from the neo-colonial system still taking place in the continent of Africa?

[femsolid]

Isn't it interesting that when they made the show Interview With The Vampire, they turned Louis, a white slave owner living in wealth on a plantation, into a black man, victimised by racism.

And yet they had no problem making Louis a slave owner of women. A pimp. Who takes girls from broken homes and sells them to men. And profits from their rape. He's trying to fight racism and make it as a black man by enslaving women. And the thing is even turned into a joke.

Tells a lot about our society I think. We can't have a white slave owner it doesn't make for a good character anymore, but trafficking women is redeemable and even something we can root for. Apparently.

[femsolid]

I was watching a streamer and when he realized that he was the only male character in his team of 8 people, his immediate reaction, after pretending to feel threatened, was to say "I'm their pimp that's why!" He then proceeded to continue role playing as a pimp, a.k.a a slave master, during the entire rest of the game. The other players, who were helping and rescuing him, didn't know, but he was commenting their actions with "that's right, these are my ladies, you have to serve me, you have to protect me, I'm your pimp, who's gonna pay your bills?" I closed the stream before it got worse.

Just thought it was interesting that, when outnumbered, a man still feels like a king. He'll even make up a scenario in his head in which he owns the women around him. It's incel logic isn't it?

I'm reaching, maybe. But I do think men don't feel threatened as long as women are around. No matter how numerous. They feel threatened when women are not accessible; when we're numerous AND out of reach. It has to be both. Otherwise, men just keep on imagining that they matter.

[femsolid]

Bath time 27/05/26