As for the people saying "Picasso did not age well.", I want to state the following:
The concept of art as a form of expression is not limited to expressing the already seen exactly as it is seems to be.
Sure, skill and aesthetics are important, but if the concept is unoriginal then its artistic value stays rather tiny.
The actual point of art is not copying the already seen in an exact manner. Although realism as art form needs much practical skill, that is not the major point of art at all.
Saying "It's not art." is wrong. If you don't like it, that's something else. Art is a form of expression, and as such it can express everthing in every imaginable (and not imaginable) way.
Don't say it's not art, if you don't know what art is actually supposed to be and only limit the concept of art to the boundaries of your own imagination.
