Came across some really old backgrounds that I had backed up on an ancient harddrive. :) Figured some of you guys might be interested in seeing them.
These are images that I used on my first desktop PC (Tiled mode, I believe for all of these.) as well as on one of my Geocities websites. These were shared from “free goodies” websites and a few were made for me by a friend I was co-owners with for a Gundam Wing and Sailor Moon shrine. ❤️
Revamping functionality, look and feel for Intelprise v3.0 coming up in 2020. Most of all, we predict massive new traffic brought about the massive size of our curated repository of premium themes, plugins, extensions and addons for both Wordpress and Magento developers to download! We guarantee better pricing than going direct and will offer many freebies during our new launch for new members signing up! How do you like our new social media logo? #intelprise #freedownloads #freemiums #freetemplates #freethemes #freeplugins #freeaddons #wordpress #woocommerce #magento #reactnative #iOS #webagency #digitalmarketing #mobileapps #seo #webdev #miami #webdesigner #developers #ecommerce #onlinestores #cybersecurity (at Intelprise) https://www.instagram.com/p/B6C-o4Jgesw/?igshid=1q0jyeynxziza
RISJ report found that 69 per cent of US and European newspapers use some form of paywall - but that figure has only risen by 5.5 per cent in two years
It is a question that every managing director wants the answer to: how do we make enough money to keep our newsrooms open and journalists in jobs?
It is a much more pressing question for online news outlets reeling from the impacts of declining digital advertising revenue. For online publishers, be that digital-born news sites or newspapers and TV news with their digital offerings, it is a key concern.
From freemiums to memberships, news organisations have employed a range of pay models to increase other revenue streams and, as a result, free content models seem to be falling out of favour.
That is at least what recent research by The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) found, showing that online news organisations are shifting, albeit gradually, away from free content in favour of a variety of pay models.
"Pay models are increasing but they are not sky-rocketing," said Felix Simon, research assistant, RISJ, author of Pay Models for Online News in the US and Europe: 2019 Update.
Simon looked at the pay models of 212 leading news organisation across Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, UK and the US. He found that 69 per cent of newspapers operate some form of pay model (freemium, metered paywall, or hard paywall).
It is not, however, the level of change nor the potency that Simon would have expected had you asked him two years ago, when the first study came out. The figure in 2017 was 64.5 per cent.
"It’s a continuation of the fact that our business models don’t work any longer; we still see the decline in print, and the decline in advertising revenue going to the big tech companies - Facebook, Google and now increasingly Amazon.
"Media organisations have to find money somewhere if they want to continue operating, and pay models are probably one of the easiest ways to do that. If you put content behind a paywall, it scares away the free-riders and entices people to pay if the content is good enough."
In some cases, like with Polish business newspaper Puls Biznesu, they made the reverse switch from a hard paywall to a metered one. Simon sees this as an effort to expand its reader base.
Still, the online space has, to some extent, raised the expectancy of news being free. Across all media types and countries in this study, more than half of news organisations (52.5 per cent) are publishing free content, dominating digital output from TV news outlets and digital-born publishers.
It might then not come as a shock that middle-ground options are also becoming popular, with freemium models (23.5 per cent) and metered paywalls (20.7 per cent) closely behind. Conversely, cases of hard paywalls are rare to come by at less than three per cent.
"Freemiums gives you a good balance between getting people to pay for certain content and not affecting reach too much, especially if it is high-quality content, because that usually has the reach to allow people to come to your site and find free content," Simon explained.
"They are usually a good compromise and still allow you to make some money through content which is paywalled."
From his point of view, this shows that audiences are willing to pay for news, buoyed by other RISJ studies citing increased audience willingness to pay for news, and the strides made by voluntary pay models, chiefly the Guardian.
But with nearly all digital-born media outlets offering free content (94 per cent), he indicates that the issue could lie with the editorial side instead.
"Part of the reason why digital-born would probably find it harder to charge for news is that there is a question of whether it's unique or is it good journalism? You can only introduce pay models if you have something nobody else does.
"So for a regional newspaper, they might have the only reporters in the field, so they are monopolists. But if you can find the same thing on BuzzFeed, Vice and Huffington Post, it’s really hard to convince people to pay for your content.
"Digital-born media has to make the case that their content is worth paying for and I’m not sure they can do that at the moment."
In that digital-born bracket is BuzzFeed and BuzzFeed News. That distinction, he said, is evidence alone that they are trying to make their journalism stand-out from their competitors.
However, he remains unconvinced that digital-born media can continue to offer news for free, pointing to the recent layoffs and jobs cuts.
"I’m personally wondering how much longer they can continue to offer news for free. They are probably afraid of scaring away people if they suddenly say ‘By the way, this is now paid for’, at the moment they are wary of going down that route.
"They are clearly under pressure and they have to do something. At the moment, in 2019, they are predominantly free, but personally I’d be hesitant to say this will continue for much longer. I’d expect digital-born to go down the pay models route.”
As one example, amidst dwindling advertising revenue, US online business news site Quartz has introduced a metered paywall last month. It asked readers to sign up for Quartz Membership after reading a tailored-number of articles.
Jay Lauf, publisher & co-CEO of Quartz, said they were simply buying their time to build up a loyal following before introducing the membership, a far cry from hesitating out of fearing audience drop-off.
"We still believe in access. But we have also talked for a while now about going beyond advertising revenue and I believe we’re at a point in time, maybe more than ever, where readers understand the value of and are interested in supporting quality journalism," he said.
"We want to be able to continue to invest and expand our offering, and all of these things work together. We still have a successful advertising business, particularly around expansive Quartz Partnerships that bring in elements beyond just ad units. So we are diversifying, not shifting.
"The success of membership so far has given us confidence that we can have a paywall that still allows for free usage and discovery but generates revenue from readers who value what we provide them."
Clarification: The 2017 study does not use US organisations and as such reports that 66 per cent of newspapers in the six EU countries studied operate a pay model. The 2019 study reports this as 64.5 per cent as an average figure.
Know when it’s time to replace open source and freeware infrastructure management tools
Know when it’s time to replace open source and freeware infrastructure management tools
Many small and midsized IT organizations rely on a mix of freeware and open source software to manage their infrastructure. These free tools can be effective and economical choices for smaller networks. But how do you know when it’s time to upgrade to a commercial product? Scale is one of the first indicators that you […] Read the source article at EMA Blog Community Original Author: Shamus…
One of the biggest challenges startups face is to get customers to pay for their product. There are two general strategies that have become popular lately…
Single Tier Product - Free trial at first, charge after 30 days
Multi Tier Product - Basic edition free, premium editions
I've tried both approaches, and while they both have pros and cons, my vote is for the second approach, and here's why…
Often times your product is new and users may not intuitively understand the true value initially. Ideally they would ramp up slowly and use your product as it is meant to be used, not in a rush of X days. Furthermore, all too often users sign up for the "free trial" but never get around to fully using it before the trial period expires. When the expiration comes and they have to decide whether to pay or not, they think to themselves "well I was able to live without this before, and I didn't really get a chance to play with it, so not going to waste my money."
Proponents of this approach argue that if the user realizes your product is indispensable, they will pay. But the key here is they have to have time to realize this. Furthermore, once a customer gets into the "free" mindset, its dangerous to forcibly charge them or take it away.
If you use the multi tier approach, the downside is just that, you have to build multiple versions of the product. However the upside is you can always present the free version for novices of your product. People can take their time to ramp up slowly and use your product in a way that makes sense. Your basic version is generally easier to understand too.
This allows users to get comfortable before you introduce new features that would further wow them. This approach sets the tone of pay-for-extras, and will also allow you to release premium versions beyond your standard for-pay version down the line.