thinking abt like. various complaints i've seen that gender-neutral deployment of masculine language (in general but also specifically On Here) harmfully contributes to the normalization of masculine-as-default
and like. i don't have zero sympathy for that, i think the Unisex/Women binary (familiar from t-shirt shapes, stupid both there and elsewhere) is not in fact any better than the much-derided Men/Non-Men approach
but i just wonder like. to what extent those complaints are taking into account the fact that On Here, most of the people i've personally observed using eg 'guy' gender-neutrally are people who were assigned, and who largely continue to be treated as, female, for whom the act of self-describing with masculine language is really one of bending over-bent but still-springy material (the self) back in the opposite direction, with the ultimate goal of restoring it to its own intrinsic shape…