can neither confirm nor deny

seen from Australia
seen from Thailand

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Serbia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
can neither confirm nor deny
Can we expect any other people with powers in your 3rd part?
I’m going to have to do my imitation of a government rep on this one 😊. I can neither confirm nor deny that other people with powers will appear in Special part 3.
[Insert evil laugh]. 😈
@ britannica
What is the 'Glomar Response'?
Introduction In United States law, the term Glomar response, also known as Glomarisation or Glomar denial, means to respond evasively to a question with the phrase “neither confirm nor deny” (NCND). For example, in response to a request for police reports relating to a certain person, the police agency may respond: “We can neither confirm nor deny that our agency has any records matching your…
Glomar Explorer - Wikipedia
:
Glomar Response: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_response
Glomar response - Wikipedia
Glomar response
In United States law, the term Glomar response (aka Glomarization or Glomar denial) refers to a “neither confirm nor deny” (NCND) response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. There are two types of instances in which a Glomarization has been used. The first is in a national security context, where to deny a request on security grounds would provide information that the documents or programs which the requester is seeking indeed exist. Glomarization is also used in the case of privacy
Source: Glomar response – Wikipedia
Glomar response was originally published on HANDS UP! DON'T SHOOT!
New video-- sorry about being late!
"How a sunken nuclear submarine, a crazy billionaire, and a mechanical claw gave birth to a phrase that has hounded journalists and lawyers for 40 years and embodies the tension between the public’s desire for transparency and the government’s need to keep secrets."