#golvan

[radsee]

I think i’ll stop now

[radsee]

:)

Rod: Oh my GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD YOU ACTUALLY DID I TH@NK YOU SO MUCH

[radsee]

@nymphoiid actually i do and its

i can do whatever i want

[radsee]

Oh my gosh, I love your Trollsona's glasses

thank you, i had the idea when i was laying down in my bed wondering how to design the WORST trollsona in the WORLD.

[zombutt]

Two commissions of my OCs I got from this wonderful person! I reaLLY, REALLY DO LOVE THEM. SCREAM.

[shitjudgessay]

Flocculant

MR GOLVAN: The point here, your Honours, is that there were two patents at issue being looked at 194, one concerned the use of flocculant in a particulate form, that is called Slatter 3, and the present patent, which is flocculant in an aqueous solution. The idea is that flocculant in an aqueous solution had generally been well known in the common general knowledge before the priority date.

FRENCH CJ: There is a difference between settlement and sedimentation on the one side and rigidification, so-called.

MR GOLVAN: That is right, your Honours.

FRENCH CJ: Another wonderful contribution by intellectual property law to the English language.

SOURCE: SNF (Australia) Pty Ltd v CIBA Specialty Chemicals Water Treatment Limited & Anor [2013] HCATrans 54 (15 March 2013)