The CEO of YouTube has now talked about age verification
video: https://mega.nz/file/zI1RmRJB#gWlWAIix0AxXs0YjfjuzGG2InIrlzneDwHJkA-2-gKo
The CEO basically argues that the system is due to government regulation and because of protecting children. But the issue there is that YouTube shouldn't be the one protecting the children, but it should be the parents protecting the children, not YouTube.
So YouTube would basically be doing the parents job of protecting the children. Even though YouTube already have things like YouTube kids (which Neal (the CEO) acknowledges in the interview) which could act as a safe version of YouTube.
He also says that the age verification system will get better, but he believes it's already a positive thing for creators. Which is weird, because I have seen multiple reports of views being down the day of the age verification being put into place
source: the internet is dead by game theory: https://mega.nz/file/ORNlXSRK#EG-ENXZ_s6gdwGqWIffJ9Ou2_L2nHvxcn5gZP4SI3Ds
So Neal clearly doesn't know what he's talking about because the age verification literally caused a massive dip in views for so many YouTubers (big or small)
Lastly, he talks about how the ID verification is supposed to act as an escape valve for when the system does mess up. Which as the channel deep humor pointed out, it's basically like YouTube made the mistake and we're having to pay for it with our privacy and government ID.
It's a horrible trade because it makes us feel like our privacy is being taken away because YouTube's AI decided to be an AI and mess up (plus it's not like it a unique thing for the YouTube AI to mess up, look at all of the videos that were marked "for kids" on YouTube, despite being clearly not for kids)
So yeah, I don't really agree with most of what Neal is saying in this video