In Zig Zag Zen, Badiner takes great pains to point out the distinction between what he calls "consciousness-restricting drugs" and what he calls "entheogens," drugs he believes give you real spiritual experiences. Perhaps we're to believe that Buddha's prohibition refers only to certain crappy drugs, and that we're free to get toasted on the good stuff. But Buddha used a word that translates as "intoxicants," thus making no such distinction possible. And FYI: the ancient Indians may not have had LSD or "E," but they knew all about naturally occurring psychedelics. This distinction, however, has a significant flaw, and by "significant" I mean "large enough to drive a '72 Buick LeSabre through." Consider this:
1. Would you ride in a car whose driver was on the consciousness-expanding "entheogenic" drug LSD?
And here's a bonus question:
2. Why does an "expanded consciousness" include the inability to operate a motor vehicle?