#harmful transid

[ponyblvd]

i nneeed to develip mor3 paraps9cial relationships 😵‍💫 anybeing who wwants a a paraosicial follower hhhuiiii 🤧 im hereee 😖

[ex-rad-kweer-anon]

hi! as someone who uses non-radqueer transids, it really is just the same only not in support of harmful ones

im also cool with non-harmful transition, and most rq transids are very pro all transition, regardless how much harm itll cause

you sometimes see people say its because they're against harmful transids, but tbh it so differs from person to person that isn't really a good example </3

Thanks for sharing this information, Anon.

To anybody reading with the answer, I would like to understand what causes an identity or transition to be harmful? and if these harmful identities or transitions could be modified or adjusted to support the individuals in question.

[ponyblvd]

"you're invalid if you're a transdictator!" you will be executed at midnight. off the carpeian rock with you!

[ponyblvd]

what people don't understand is that being anti "harmful transid" is that it's going to hurt people. being anti-amputee is the same as being anti-access to drugs. it's not going to stop people, it's going to make the only resources unsafe or harmful.

[transantiradqueer]

On "harmful transIDs"...I just can't get behind that term for anything more than transharmful and transhateful.

I think it's more of a case-by-case basis than some are willing to see. What we should be calling it instead is "bad faith" because there ARE good faith ways to identify as transage: which some consider a harmful transID.

Maybe "harmful transitioning" suits some things better. There's ways to harmfully transition to the good faith transIDs too.

Does this make sense?