#harvis

[jervis-tetch-my-beloved]

Heyyy Cass :) for the OTP ask game: 1, 6, 8, 16, 26, 28 and 40!!! (I know it’s a lot sorry)

Now for which OTP, well the best one of course HARVIS

Thank you for indulging in my madness Gus 😊😚

Read more cause I really don’t wanna subject this to people who don’t like it lmao I’ll scar them

1. Who most initiates PDA?

Jervis absolutely! I mean to be fair they can’t leave the house whenever they want cause you know. Jervis kinda murders people and Harv is a cop. That doesn’t go well together. But when they can it’s always Jervis. Harvey wouldn’t know what appropriate PDA is if it smacked him upright

6. When did they realize they loved each other?

So for Jervis it was kinda fast after they actually spender time together cause you know, Jervis is very fucking weird.

For Harvey uhh, it kinda took him awhile. Lots of convincing and compliments and touches from jerv kinda got him used to him, and then it was ALLLLLL downhill from there.

8. What’s one way their personalities compliment one another?

They are legitimately the “Someone will die” “Of fun!” meme.

16. Who stays up way too late and who tries to drag them to bed?

Harvey stays up to late and Jervis has to drag him to bed. Stuff like cuddling and sleeping with his significant other is very important to jerv so he kinda gets excited for it and is Harvey doesn’t comply he will be forced to. It’s cuddle time boy.

26. How do they comfort each other?

Jervis is much more like, nurturing when it comes to his significant other, especially Harvey cause he’s stupid and doesn’t know proper self care. It usually starts with lots of pampering cause he’s just like that, lots of compliments lots of kisses, probably a meal made for him, and then he will softly get him to open up about what’s upsetting him.

And since as I said Harvey’s kinda stupid, he doesn’t really know how to do that. Like he knows the basics, like don’t make it worse. But he doesn’t go as far. Probably a cuddle and kissing, maybe like a movie night, but that’s probably it.

28. Do they get along with each other’s friends and family?

Ahaha, so this is where personal hcs come in. It’s canon that jervis’s family is dead, or at least his parents and sister, and we don’t know anything about Harvey’s, so I assumed his was dead or they don’t talk anymore.

40. Who makes the other smile with almost no effort at all?

So again Jervis is fucking weird, and literally Harvey could do anything and he’d sit there with a goofy stupid ass grin on his face, holding his chin in his hands while he cooed about how pretty he is.

Tl:dr? Jervis is weird and in love and Harvey is done with life. The end.

[dorksquadsquotes]

Jervis: Oh, shit!

Harley: Jervis, don't curse. You are in public

Jervis: Mamma Mia, that's a spicy meatball!

Harley: You know what? Just say fuck.

[trashtalkingtony]

Sir that was my emotional support bot

[theinfostride]

Jim Iyke Celebrates His Son's Birthday, Harvis

Jim Iyke Celebrates His Son’s Birthday, Harvis

Jim Iyke’s son, Harvis Chidubem Iyke turned one on Thursday, September 1, 2016, and the talented actor couldn’t help but gush over him. The Nollywood actor took to his Instagram page to share a picture collage of his son and his birthday cake, alongside a sweet message. Commenting on the photo, Iyke wrote: “Happy Earthstrong King Harviui. Your grandpa warned me time would go fast. Nobody said…

View On WordPress

[drewvigal]

The answer on team success:

… members who communicated a lot, participated equally and possessed good emotion-reading skills.

Some obvious thoughts:

First, their members contributed more equally to the team’s discussions, rather than letting one or two people dominate the group.

and

… teams with higher average I.Q.s didn’t score much higher on our collective intelligence tasks than did teams with lower average I.Q.s. Nor did teams with more extroverted people, or teams whose members reported feeling more motivated to contribute to their group’s success.

and not so obvious:

teams with more women outperformed teams with more men.

And finally:

What makes teams smart must be not just the ability to read facial expressions, but a more general ability, known as “Theory of Mind,” to consider and keep track of what other people feel, know and believe.

Something to wrap our head around for Harvis. Mmm….

[storymidwife-blog]

Why Go to the Movies? | JSTOR Daily

In 2014, attendance at the movies hit its lowest level in two decades.

[afourthact]

We appreciate NYTimes' Lens for recognizing our collaborative work with Tim Matsui and Leaving the Life. On the heels of working with the documentary film, American Promise, we are honored for the opportunity to work on the issue of domestic minor sex trafficking with Tim.

Wanting to look beyond the typical audience, he turned to Laura Lo Forti and her husband, Andrew DeVigal, whose company, A Fourth Act, focuses on helping photographers and filmmakers interact with audiences more deeply in order to affect the issues they care about.

In the Lens post, we urged filmmakers that making and distributing the film aren't enough.

Making your story and releasing it is only half of the work. The other half of the work is to engage with an audience and capture the needs of a community to spark change.

and

Mr. DeVigal and Ms. Lo Forti are not looking for large crowds, but for the people who are most involved with an issue and those in position to spur change. Through documentaries and moderated conversations, they seek to turn stakeholders into problems solvers. To accomplish this they started up a web-based mobile app, Harv.is, which captures audience feedback in real time and creates data visualizations to facilitate conversations.

If there's a story you want to tell that builds on community, we want to hear from you.

[afourthact]

We have the long-view insight for Harvis.

The data they gathered allowed them to compare responses to the film in different settings and from different types of viewers. They realized that part of the alchemy of hosting a productive conversation is carefully curating invitations to ensure lively and relevant participation. The most powerful discussion happened in the classroom, DeVigal says, noting that this suggests many educational uses for the tool.