#hell yeah dude

[fctionblue]

i made this for tiktok

[baba-is-blog]

NAME IS EXCELLENT

BABA IS APPROVE

[kittoforos]

ORBAN OUT! LET'S GO HUNGARIANSSSSSSSSS

[plumsfromyouricebox]

Okay but Max being really possessive over Mike is still cute AF lol. Though I could see some dramatic potential in it too, like she becomes disturbed at this raging jealousy she feels when another girl's gaze lingers on him too long because it reminds her of Billy and his own anger issues.

[clobertina]

hey, new spino dropped

it's spinosaurus mirabilis

LETS

FREAKING

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[missenera]

hi i saw u had unstable reqs…

can i request some torchflower duo 😭 (flame and lomedy)

Yes :P Late to doing this because the moment I posted the call out for recommendations I got hit with artblock</3

small chibi duo yay!

[atlaslovesedm]

sometimes i get bored and make clones of things i like

AWESOEME

[grandpasessions]

But there is another function of prohibiting prohibitions which is no less crucial: that of maintaining appearances, and we all know how absolutely crucial appearances were under Stalinism: the Stalinist regime reacted with total panic whenever there was a threat that appearances would be disturbed (say, that some accident which made clear the failure of the regime might be reported in the public media: there were, in the Soviet media, no black chronicles, no reports on crimes and prostitution, not to mention workers' or other types of public protests).

Which is why this prohibition of prohibitions is far from limited to Communist regimes: It is operative also In today's "permissive" capitalism.

A "postmodern" boss insists that he is not a master but just a coordinator of our joint creative efforts, the first among equals; there should be no formalities among us, we should address him by his nickname, he shares a dirty joke with us . . . but during all this, he remains our master. In such a social link, relations of domination function through their denial: in order to be operative, they have to be ignored.

We are not only obliged to obey our masters, we are also obliged to act as if we were free and equal, as if there was no domination—which, of course, makes the situation even more humiliating. Paradoxically, in such a situation, the first act of liberation is to demand from the master that he act like one: one should reject false collegiality from the master and insist that he treat us with cold distance, as a master.

(The same goes for patriarchal domination over women: in modern societies, this domination is no longer admitted as such—which is why one of the subversive tactics of feminine resistance is mockingly to act as if subordinated . . .)

In Defense of Lost Causes S. Zizek