#i often do

[juniperpyre]

what should i focus on in the new year

james pov character exploration canon one-shot series

jily orpheus and eurydice au

somewhere on lsd (modern au in chicago)

earth after rain one shot(s)

jily thg/everlark au (keep in mind i am a marxist kinda)

jilypad enemies to lovers (feat arcane vibes (james is cop so it's not set irl))

jily professor/student canon universe au (lily ~25, james ~45 and married. w kid

Voting ended onJan 2, 2025

[asteracaea]

does anyone else ever have the urge to scream FLAMINGO PINK SUNRISE BOULEVARD

[bigmanroykent]

My friend explaining the target muscles for the lunges she's showing me: so think about jamie tartt's butt,

[pfctsrms]

Ever read or watch something and be like. This is the main character why?

[wonderingabout]

i had a lovely time in the woods

[imminentinertia]

I despise how "uncut" is the term for "shows that include some sex (and, but rarely, violence) scenes that aren't included in the 13+ version". "Uncut" means "unedited". Of course they're edited. I hate imprecise language.

Not to mention that I recently saw a comment that seemed like the person thinks "uncut" means "director's cut". It doesn't. Oh, and "director's cut" means "the director didn't agree that the version that was first aired/screened is the best/intended version, they had to compromise then and weren't entirely satisfied with the outcome, but this is a version they're happier with".

Let's get rid of the word "uncut" in this context. I declare that from this day on, the steamier version of a show is the extended version.

[thesealfriend]

I gotta word this very carefully else I risk summoning the Disk Horse, but... since my return to NSFW Tumblr I've noticed a lot of people being very strict about blocking anyone who doesn't have their exact ages in their bio (like, even "over 18" or "late 20s" isn't enough for some folk). And like, of course you've got the right to restrict your content as you see fit, especially when it comes to protecting your adult space from minors, but I genuinely do not get the point in being that specific?

Like, how is having your actual age in your bio any more helpful than just asserting you're over 18 when you could be lying either way? I have my age in my bio of all my blogs just cause it doesn't feel like super important info to me, but for the people who do wanna be as vague as "21+" or "thirtysomething" etc, it feels weird thinking they should be restricted from accessing adult spaces.

Idk I just remember when the norm across the internet was informing people your content was for over-18s and only taking action when you actually suspected minors were involved, and I totally support individuals deciding to be more proactive than that, but I worry that this is just another way it's becoming normalised to expect personal info from strangers on the internet.