To pro-endos and endo-safe spaces in the Misce+ community and adjacent tags: Please stop interacting with me and stop hiding behind ambiguous plural or neutral labels. Singlets, even if you consider yourself indifferent to "syscourse," you need to research the foundational roots of the non-disorder/endo "system" community. It originated as an anti-psychiatric, anti-medical, predatory ableist movement that specifically targeted disordered individuals with CDDS and the alterhuman community and continues to promote these sentiments today.
If you're indifferent to misrepresented spiritual beliefs that undermine both their original cultures and go on to talk over thw voices of people with dissociative disorders and their loved ones, you're not "staying in your lane" you're complicit in the abuse of marginalized people. For those demanding proof of these origins, I've archived information in my pinned links that provides the necessary documentation.
If you still choose to dismiss this evidence, please leave this space, block me. If you don't support us and don't actively push back against saneism, ableism, spiritual misinformation and cultural appropriation, you're siding with oppressors, not helping us. Your "freedom to do whatever" is not operating in good faith but rather supporting a misplaced understanding of cultural spirituality that most endos know nothing about, unsurprising, since their concepts originated from a white woman misinterpreting Buddhism.
I understand not wanting to get involved in these conflicts for your own mental health, but claiming neutrality doesn't remove you from responsibility. When you say you're neutral, you're implicitly accepting all the harmful foundations of this community and the problematic behaviors that accompany it. Wanting to protect your mental health is valid, but recognize that your complacency contributes to harm against our community and enables the weaponization of recycled terms from trans communities (like "sysmed") that aren't comparable to actual trans oppression.
It's wild how people can look at Christianity and call it out for being built on predatory foundations, pointing to all the horrific things done in its name that still get weaponized today and they're absolutely right to do so. But then they'll turn around and defend the origins of "non-disordered plurality" without a second thought.
Let's be real about what actually happened: a white, neurotypical woman with a misinterpretation around Buddha’s accession went out of her way to deliberately targeted people with CDDs (and spiritual Alterhumans) who were already struggling with shame and stigma around their diagnosis. She created darkpersonalities.com to exploit this vulnerability. Sybil went on to form Astreasweb the literal ground zero for this "non-disordered plurality" movement encouraging these struggling people to showcase their most damaged, unhealed parts, especially persecutors on dark personalities.net. The whole point was to push the narrative that CDDs aren't real or are inherently dangerous while “natural” plurality is safe, good and pure. Hmm sounds familiar doesn’t it? The way the Christians demonized Pagans and literally everyone else into their faith.
So yeah, tell me again how one religions problematic foundations make it irredeemable, but this movements predatory origins are somehow acceptable?
