El ser de una vida humana es su haber surgido como una fuerza contraria a la terminalidad interna del ser: el ser humano decae, desfallece y acaba en el sentido de hacerlo todo de manera opositiva, reactiva, fugitiva[.]
Julio Cabrera

seen from Bulgaria
seen from Philippines
seen from Malaysia
seen from Austria

seen from China
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Netherlands

seen from China
seen from China

seen from China
seen from T1
seen from T1
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
El ser de una vida humana es su haber surgido como una fuerza contraria a la terminalidad interna del ser: el ser humano decae, desfallece y acaba en el sentido de hacerlo todo de manera opositiva, reactiva, fugitiva[.]
Julio Cabrera
Regretting having to die should be structurally identical to regretting being born.
Julio Cabrera, “Negative Ethics”
The traditional questions of ethics have been: "How can we live ethically?" ,“How should we live?” (in deontological ethics) and “how can we ethically be happy?” (in utilitarian, hedonistic and eudaemonistic ethics). The usual ethical theories were ethics of how, never ethics of what. Their questions were not radical, because they assumed that to be moral and to continue living should be naturally two compatible enterprises, the only problem being how to live ethically, but never asking if we can live (and give life to others) and be ethical at the same time.
Julio Cabrera, “Negative Ethics”
“We are forced to struggle, to compete and to win, and we are obliged not to mind living in a society maintained by the slave-like labor of most people. To go on living, we must learn to cultivate a certain degree of moral insensitivity.”
~Julio Cabrera
Been reading a lot of Julio Cabrera philosophy lately. He really is my philosopher. The closest to my heart.