#kaye-star

[voidix]

Thank you my love @kaye-star

[richardmcbain]

kaye-star replied to your post: hyrude: why are non-offensive moves even an option...

It tends to be called strategy. That boost is why I just knocked out your pokemon in one hit on the next turn.

[bxdr429]

kaye-star replied to your post: I had a great weekend with the love of my life,...

I have to work on Valentine’s Day anyway. I had a great time with you, love! <3

I’m glad you did, mi amor! <3

[bugeyedfreaks]

Which do think is better (or worse)? The reboot or the Japanese anime?

The reboot.

The anime is at least it’s own thing and you can separate it from the original series. It doesn’t pretend to be something it isn’t.

[arendellekingdom]

Something I can't stop thinking about. I know Elsa was originally the villain. What makes me curious is when did Anna enter the picture? Did Elsa always have a sister or was she originally an only child at some point during production? I've read before, the idea was Elsa struck Anna on purpose, though I don't know if that refers to the childhood incident or the one at the ice palace.

Though the development of the movie, there were always two female characters. Through one point of development they were just a child and a queen-- like in the original fairy tale-- and they later became two sisters. 

What made Anna and Elsa become sisters was just a question that someone said “What if the reason they are involved with each other is because they are sisters?” Surprisingly the studio can’t remember who said this and who ever asked this life changing question at the studios hasn’t claimed it. 

Once the characters were siblings, another question appears: “Is Elsa evil or purpose or not?” First she was, then she wasn’t. 

Elsa in the final draft of the movie would never strike Anna on purpose; evil Queen Elsa earlier in development could have done that.