#let's deduce

[autistobrat]

hello!!! how are you??

i have a doubt that suddenly cam eto my mind. now that we've been mutuals for a while, what can you deduce about me? 🤔

(no pressure to do this mate :))

hallooo I'm fine :DD

67th (siiiiixxx seveennnnnnnn) (sorry) (I had to)

Your blog screams of someone who’s simultaneously sprawling and precise, chaotic and methodical. You’re a minor navigating multiple fandoms, but the way you present yourself is like a fortress. It has layers of information, explicit rules about who can and cannot interact, and detailed content warnings. That tells me you take your personal safety and mental space seriously. Which is good. Approved :D

The color-coded, highlighted, neurodivergent-friendly intro post is brilliant. It shows empathy, forethought, and a high degree of conscientiousness. You’re not just protecting yourself but also trying to make things accessible for others, which is surprisingly selfless for someone your age. Also approved :D

Your pronouns paired with your ambivert self-description show that you’re adaptable in social settings. You like being approachable, but you still have boundaries. Social anxiety and trust issues are front and centre, but you’re actively working on them. That balance between vulnerability and defence is a recurring theme here. You’re navigating the world cautiously, but not passively.

You’re extremely invested in identity, fandom, and personal projects. The sheer amount of detail you put into categorising your favourite characters, kin lists, comfort movies, spotify playlists, ocs, and your tagged projects is an obvious clue that you find stability and meaning in structured creativity. You are meticulous about organisation. It suggests that, despite the chaos of your inner world, you crave systems and categorisation to keep things comprehensible. Because for some reason, you can't do that to your inner world.

Your asexual, sex-repulsed orientation is handled directly and clearly. Boundary. You want people to know exactly what’s comfortable for you, and the honesty is refreshing. The same goes for your dni section; not fear-mongering but strategic, protecting both your mental health and your enjoyment of the blog.

Your interests and fandoms are eclectic but thoughtful. Martin Freeman dominate your blog (your pfp and even your username), which makes sense given your admiration for intelligent, methodical, sometimes emotionally restrained characters. You pair that with Ghostbusters, Good Omens (aziraphale), and various animated series. Common characteristic? Those medias range from witty and cerebral to absurd and imaginative. You enjoy complexity, humour, and layered storytelling. You’re drawn to characters and narratives that reward attention, observation, and emotional engagement.

Pets and animals are a clear passion. The way you highlight these indicates that you value nurturing relationships and derive comfort from tangible, living things. Animals are predictable, loyal, and nonjudgmental, everything human interactions sometimes aren’t, which is likely why they matter to you.

Your creative pursuits showed me a highly tactile, exploratory mind (I sound like a psychic don't I. I'm never using this sentence structure again). You like making things, seeing ideas take form, and creating universes you can control. Even if you say you’re still learning, the commitment to multiple disciplines indicates perseverance and curiosity.

The humor and personality in your user boxes (which I loveeee) show your self-awareness and playfulness. It’s performative, yes, but also comforting in the sense that you establish in-jokes and personas which reinforce your identity. You’re protective of your fandom spaces while still letting yourself have fun.

[identitycroissant-tm]

CROISSANT

wot. is ur favoyrite type of pastry. OTHER than croissants.

Also. wot. is. the coolest/strangest/craziest thing that u have deduced

ALSOOOO. wot. is your favourite type. of. deep sea creature.

heheh samosa ehe (Due to the complex question, I went down a Wikipedia rabbit hole regarding the definition of pastry. thank you for that)

The craziest thing I deduced was a guy's economic status based on his book. (he was reading a novel, fantasy, borrowed from the library.

Bookmarked with a receipt, faded. The libraries where I live give out receipts for the books you borrow, so he was meticulous.

Not only that, probably a frequent user. He worked at a security company, security guard, judging by his company issued trousers and shirt and his watch.

His bag and watch were relatively new, barely scratched. So, came into some money plus he has the luxury of time to go to the library frequently? Doesn't need overtime salary then. So, he was relatively well-off.)

Uhh deep-sea creature would be any cephalopod. they're very cool heh.

thank you hehe.

[autistobrat]

a deduction requested by @/maximillien-morreldantes via dm

68th

You wear names like costumes and act like each one is the most natural thing in the world. One minute you’re Cas, the next you’re Maximilien, then Edmond (....... EDMOND???) (anyways), Patroclus, Hades. That’s deliberate multiplicity. You enjoy inhabiting other skins, testing modes, and running dozens of personas because identity is a playground, not a single lane. You’re a roleplayer who treats characters like tools. Probably because you aren't that comfortable being yourself as truly as others, the reason being you having heard the same thing about yourself over and over again by a motherfucker (the motherfucker being your biological father figure). You don't want to be defined as one.

You run a small theatrical empire of rp blogs. That level of effort is almost as good as an infrastructure building. You’re curating worlds, moderating social ecosystems, and carrying other people’s emotional props. That means you like the whole process of building the stage, setting the rules, then watching the chaos happen where you can influence it. You’re creative and logistical in the same breath. It also reflects a deeper drive that you crave communication. Each blog, each themed persona, each tiny niche you maintain is a conduit for interaction. The more themes and purposes, the more avenues for engagement, and the more your inner world finds resonance with others, which was hard to find in your household I'd like to call 'hell hole'.

You advertise boundaries loudly. Those are not performative virtue signs, but rather hardwired defence mechanisms. Someone taught you early that errors of empathy cost a lot; you don’t let people make that mistake twice. That ferocity around rules comes from a pragmatic place.

You crave flirtation in a manic, theatrical way. It's obvious, if you think about it, with 'BEING FLIRTED WITH' as an item in your interests. You like the rush of being adored and read, and you’re not shy about asking for it. It’s affectionate, performative, and a little testing. You want to see who will play along and who will break the script. That craving for connection extends beyond flirtation. Attention, communication, and dialogue. You want to be part of an active exchange.

You love deep, dramatic texts and weird-cult-y audio worlds. You read and replay the grand, tragic mechanics of literature and myth because they give you templates for meaning. You index yourself against works like The Count of Monte Cristo and Jane Eyre, because revenge, reinvention, survival through identity are your motifs. You live for narrative arcs where the protagonist is remade by suffering and then weaponise that remaking. You follow and remix the uncanny psychological registers of The Magnus Archives and enjoy the cryptic, community-radio surrealism of Welcome to Night Vale (I am also fond of this podcast). You hoard modern fantasy systems like Mistborn because rules + rebellion = fun (I totally agree).

You run an official blog about religion and also a gag roster of character blogs. You like institutional formality as much as you like anarchic play. In practice that means you can be solemnly didactic about theology or throw a ridiculous rp thingamajig where half the cast is a pastry. You want both serious meaning and stupid fun.

Your history is the hard line under everything. Abuse from your father and PTSD that wrecks sleep are the reason you built strict boundaries, why you cultivate control through countless personas, and why you insist on 'no hate' as a life-or-death policy. You are hyper-vigilant; you read tone, register, and intent like a radar because you learned the cost of missing danger. That same learning made you fiercely protective of anyone who ends up on your side. You most possibly value the people you love more than yourself. If someone earns that space in your life, they matter above all else, and you will go to extraordinary lengths for them.

You perform chaos because performance is safer than exposure. Chaos lets you be unpredictable on your terms; authenticity sometimes feels too close to vulnerability. So you keep the show with flirting, snark, opulent tag systems, and mood posts, railing at any discourse that smell 'harassment'.

You track suicidal mood like a weather report. Your 'sui ratings' tag is brutal honesty disguised as documentation. Monitoring. You are painfully aware that you are highly suicidal, so you’re building a public ledger so you (and maybe people who care) can measure storms before they become floods. That dual impulse is practical and terrifyingly brave. You are doing a great job :D

You refuse AI, MAGA, and other fandoms that spill toxicity all over everyone else. You pick enemies precisely and loudly.

[autistobrat]

also, I’ve just looked a little closer at your blog and I’m so terribly sorry! I shouldn’t have asked for a deduction at such a busy time, please only bother if you have time!!! It’s not something that is necessary, please only do so if you want to! Thank you and sorry again <3

oh no no no it's fine, really :DD

71st

Your first impression was 'nervous enthusiasm wrapped in self-deprecating humour'. The whole intro reads like you are excited to share things but you immediately duck behind a wall of 'Im bad at this lol please don’t judge'. You say your art is bad, your apps are bad, your blog is just a hiding place for 'huge small obsessions'. That kind of wording usually isn’t literal, and is usually a protective reflex. People who constantly pre-downplay their skills are usually afraid of being evaluated. So you sabotage expectations before anyone else can. Which.... covers approximately two thirds of people who I deduced so far.

So if we were to drag out a meaningful conclusion, I could say that you probably care quite a lot about what people think, even if you pretend you don’t.

Your ask button literally begging for interaction is another interesting detail. That’s not subtle (you used all caps). It suggests you enjoy conversation and validation from others, but you’re also slightly worried nobody will initiate it unless you make the invitation obvious. You want engagement, but you don’t want to demand attention directly, so you disguise it as humour. Which works.

Now the fandom list :D

You gravitate toward story-heavy, character-driven universes with big emotional arcs. Notice the pattern. Those are found-family fandoms. Teams, companions, messy emotional bonds, people saving each other repeatedly etc etc.

People who gravitate strongly toward those dynamics tend to value loyalty, belonging, and emotional connection more than average if I'm not wrong. You like worlds where people stick together even when everything is falling apart.

Your shipping choices give another clue. Your ships are… let’s say emotionally intense. Dramatic relationships where characters fight, hurt each other, but still circle back. From this I can know that you are drawn to complicated emotional narratives instead of neat, healthy perfection (honestly real; who likes healthy perfection).

Then there’s the sports list of which combination is interesting because it’s very physically disciplined. Swimming and rowing especially require persistence, repetition, and tolerance for discomfort. Those sports attract people who are stubborn in a quiet way. Not loud competitive ego types, but the kind who grind through effort because quitting would annoy them more than the pain. Side point: I could never :'D

Your creative hobbies also show a pattern. All slow, tactile crafts, things where progress comes from patience. That suggests you’re comfortable with process rather than insstant results. People who knit and sew tend to tolerate long projects without immediate payoff. That says something about your temperament.

The tea comment and complaining about British weather/politics is practically a cultural fingerprint. Very British coping mechanism, one could say.

Now the social angle.

You say this Tumblr is where you hide your 'obsessions from the world.' That implies your offline environment might not share these interests. Tumblr becomes the pressure valve where you can actually be enthusiastic without feeling embarrassing. Which is good. Keep up :3

The tone of your apology message in the ask reinforces that. You’re extremely polite, almost over-apologetic for taking someone’s time (I don't care about taking my time; in fact, please take them I don't want it /lh). That usually means you’re used to minimizing your needs so you don’t annoy others.

Put together, I figured that you’re much more intense than you let on. You’re the kind of person who works extremely hard, cares deeply about fictional characters, apologises for existing, drinks alarming amounts of tea, and probably underestimates your own competence by a mile. A fairly typical Tumblr human. Just with better endurance.

Also I think you would like slow burns......

[autistobrat]

may i here a deduction :D (lowk scared for it but it’s fine)

Your whole blog is a contradiction (better than being boring so please keep it like so). You posture chaos but crave order, hence the notes game (I wish I could afford to do those). You don’t play with randomness. Rather, you cage it, number it, turn it into a system. That’s not whimsy, that’s control dressed in fun. Viola and guitar: one in tradition, one in more 'rebellion'. You call it “music” with a demon emoji, but that’s just bravado. The real answer is “music keeps me from unravelling.”

You call yourself genderfluid, bisexual. Not confusion but certainty. But you know people will misread it, so you lace the label with humour and over-explanation. Defensive tic. Same with “not a crazy Swiftie.” You care too much, you know it, so you insist you don’t. Obsession, deflected.

Room decorating, kandi, Pinterest are “spontaneous” hobbies that are really rituals. Control again. You claim boredom, but it’s avoidance. Doom-scrolling until 3 a.m., calling it “lowk bored,” when it’s really "If I stop, I have to be in my own head". And you don’t want that. (Who wants that, to be honest though)

Your shows are escapism in uniform: queer-coded fantasy, found families, bright colours masking heavy themes. Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Heartstopper shows your liking for laughter and softness. Arcane (ugghhh believe me the directors never heard of 'a happily ever after' in their childhood), Stranger Things on the other hand shows your interest towards angst and trauma packaged as spectacle. A mirror, all of it.

“Be gay do crime.” It’s a shield. Loud online, quieter offline. You say “message me unless creepy,” but you need people to reach out. Begging for interaction but terrified of it. You overcorrect and overshare online to prove you’re accessible, then recoil when it gets too real. Push, pull. But you're doing really great (the notes game, for example) so keep on trying!

Anxiety. Called “yay” in your intro. You bury severity under humour, like it’s a punchline. Water reminders, hair-brushing goals, teeth twice a day… it’s not “silly Tumblr games,” it’s you disguising the fact you need accountability to keep functioning. It’s a cry for help no one reads as one. And don't be embarrassed; I can't do that.

Swift obsession, Lydia B. Collins fixation. Therefore I know that you are pattern-seeking, clinging to external narratives when your own feels too fragmented. Same with making “projects” into punishments. You believe in potential but don’t trust yourself to reach it without public witness. So you perform.

Minor. You say it flat, let people “do with that what you will.” But you’re already trying on the cadence of adulthood. Dry wit, internet sarcasm, even the way you write about love—aching sincerity wrapped in irony. Too young to be jaded, too sharp not to be. How stressed you must be. (I know because I used to be stressed. But Tumblr seems like a nice place so far and I'm enjoying it :3)

So yeah. It would be really helpful if you tell me something I got wrong or slightly off (because I'm sure there is at least one). Thank you for waiting this long and have a nice day :D

[autistobrat]

I keep on seeing the deduction posts on my dash and well, they’re fascinating. I’m now very curious; so if you’re still doing them, please do my blog!

Thank you, and have great day

oh I have gone and invaded your fyp as well :'D

70th

“’Till I’m bloody and bruised, ’Till I’m laughing alone.” Oof. Dramatic. Poetic. Slightly tragic. The kind of line that tells me that you are someone who are drawn to stories about endurance rather than comfort. You like characters who keep going even when they’re wrecked. Perseverance is a core value for you, I can say.

Your header photos (taken by yourself) including grey skies and rain fits that mood. Rainy aesthetic blogs are everywhere, but yours reads less like “sad internet aesthetic” and more like quiet contemplation. Maybe you’re someone who spends a lot of time thinking.

Your ask button says Enter if ye dare. That’s playful intimidation. Not aggressive, just theatrical. Like your blog title. You like a bit of mythic flair around normal interactions. Also it's tumblr so. Old English is common. Nice touch :)

Then the introduction, which is calm, friendly, and straightforward. You don’t perform irony here. You present yourself plainly. That already sets you apart from half of Tumblr, which usually layers everything in sarcasm and memes. Like me. heh.

But then you immediately mention running a sideblog about Cuccos from The Legend of Zelda. Which means the seriousness is balanced by a sense of humour that leans toward chaotic absurdity. Anyone who has played a Zelda game knows those chickens are tiny feathery agents of vengeance (if I'm not wrong?). You’re the type who finds humour in the ridiculous logic of game worlds and then leans into it.

Moving on!

Your fandom list is huge, but there’s a pattern. You gravitate toward long-running mythic universes and ensemble casts. These are all worlds where narrative and lore matter a lot. You like big stories with mythological weight, complicated timelines, and characters that symbolise ideas.

Your gaming history also tells a story. You actually play through things (unlike me who dabble around). You’ve completed several entries in The Legend of Zelda and multiple games in the Final Fantasy line-up. That’s commitment. JRPGs alone demand patience from my experience.

And then we hit the key point; Final Fantasy IX is your favourite game.

That’s revealing. That story is very philosophical (I figured out after a quick research). Identity, mortality, existential purpose, chosen family, the fear of nonexistence..... You see the pattern. If that game resonates enough that you could 'rant and analyse forever', then you’re someone who loves moral and philosophical storytelling. Which makes the Aristotle quote in your intro make perfect sense.

You don’t just believe in kindness. You believe in philosophical definitions of kindness.

Now let’s talk about the religious section.

You state clearly that you’re Catholic and firm in your beliefs. But you also explicitly say you don’t believe in hate and that people can disagree while still loving each other. That’s actually a very specific moral framework. You’re trying to reconcile conviction with compassion.

A lot of people online frame belief as either total acceptance of everything or total rejection of people. You’re attempting a middle position (= disagreement without cruelty). Whether people agree with that or not, it’s obvious you’ve thought about it seriously.

You’re not posting the statement casually. You’re anticipating the conflict and addressing it ahead of time. That shows foresight.

The pro-life userbox and religious statement suggest your ethics come from a consistent worldview rather than internet trends. You care about moral coherence. You want your beliefs to align with each other.

Now the writing section.

You write fanfiction on AO3 and Wattpad under the same name. That’s not unusual, but the sheer number of outlines you’ve listed is interesting. And many of them are still outlines.

That’s the writer brain at work where ideas multiply faster than chapters. Whether it's a curse or a gift will be upon you :')

Your au ideas show that you like exploring alternate possibilities within established mythologies. My analysis is that you’re not satisfied by just consuming canon, and that you want to experiment with it.

Your biggest project seems tied to the Linked Universe fandom, which is itself built around The Legend of Zelda lore. Again, you gravitate toward mythic structures.

You also welcome questions about your religion and your stories. That’s interesting because those are the two things people tend to avoid discussing online. But you’re open about them. Which is good *thumbs up*

That tells me that you value conversation more than comfort. Because you’re not trying to start fights, but you’re also not hiding your beliefs just to avoid disagreement.

Now judging by the overall tone, you’re polite. Consistently polite. Even when stating controversial positions, you frame them calmly. Not passive. Intentional civility.

You seem like the kind of person who prefers thoughtful debate over shouting matches. You’re not trying to dominate conversations. You’re trying to participate in them honestly.

Which, frankly, is rarer here than people like to admit.

[autistobrat]

Sorry if this seems bothering but Im really interested, actually. Could you deduce about me too?

Your media interests are a blueprint of your personality. Simm’s Master? You admire charisma that hides deep-rooted instability; villains who smile while the world collapses. Moriarty from Sherlock? Same archetype but with a British accent and theatrical flair. That fascination says you have a soft spot for controlled chaos; people who are dangerous but only because they’re brilliant enough to pull it off. I mean, it's not going to be fun if there's only brains; you need some chaos ;)

Brett from TwoSetViolin? Your admiration for talent is high, but you also need it to be humanized with humour. You don’t like ‘perfect’; you like exceptional but approachable. Hence why you gravitate towards musicians who make Bach jokes instead of untouchable virtuosos. And honestly, valid choice.

Your choice of shows (Doctor Who, Sherlock, House MD) portrays you as someone who admires intelligence above all else, especially when paired with moral ambiguity and social awkwardness. You like characters who are brilliant but flawed, probably because you see yourself in them; emotionally reserved, often misunderstood, but quietly proud of your ability to see what others don’t.

You describe yourself as emotionally unavailable and prone to dry texting. Classic INTJ defense mechanism. It’s not that you don’t feel things, it’s that you hate performing emotion for others unless they’ve earned it. People often mistake you for cold when you’re actually watching and calculating. I see you. Everyday. Every conversation.

You’ve already told people you don’t like shipping or fandom drama, which means you’ve seen enough internet chaos to develop a hard boundary against it. You’re protective of your own emotional space because you know how easily fandom toxicity can spiral, and you refuse to be pulled into it. That’s why you insist people ‘talk to you like a human being’; you want actual intellectual conversation, not superficial fandom screaming. But I should tell you: wrong side of the internet, mate.

You like classical music, probably because it’s structured yet emotional. It gives you a way to feel things without the messy unpredictability of people. That matches your interest in medical stuff; you like systems you can understand and solve, whether it’s diagnosing an illness or interpreting a symphony.

Your personality is paradoxical in the best way, also. You admire chaos (Moriarty, the Master) but live life controlled. You want people to think you’re unshakable, but you also warn them about mood swings because you know you can be volatile, just not in the loud, dramatic way. You keep people at arm’s length until you decide they’re worth pulling closer, and then? You’re loyal, but still guarded.

At least that's what I concluded.

[autistobrat]

Chat I'm curious I stumbled upon thine blog by accident and now I kind of want a deduction?? What's a person gotta do for one 👁️👁️

47th

(don't expect too much though) (I suck)

You call yourself Captain because 1. why not 2. it's fun and 3. the title makes you feel safe. It lets you lead without the risk of seeming domineering. You build a plane out of your blog (flight, carry-ons, snacks) because the aesthetic gives you control, and you crave that. You like knowing the rules, setting the tone, assigning the seats.

You are unfailingly polite, but your politeness is precision, not passivity. Every emoji, every 'haha sorry' is a way to manage perception. You apologise before anyone can accuse you. You lower yourself slightly so no one else gets the chance to push you down. You’ve turned self-deprecation into armour plating. (who doesn't?)

You tell people you’re eighteen, but you don’t quite feel eighteen. You’ve been reading the room your entire life. You learned early how to make yourself palatable. That’s why your humour is self-aware, and your tone is perfect blend of cheer and exhaustion. You’re already nostalgic for a version of yourself you never got to be.

You curate everything not because you’re vain, but because order soothes you. Your Masterlist, your Queue, your Request Info posts are not just organisational tools. They are management systems disguised as service. You can’t stop yourself from creating frameworks.

You write in loops. Returning to ideas, rephrasing, reworking, because you don’t trust your first draft, or your second. You rewrite not for perfection, but for reassurance. You need the rhythm of fixing things to convince yourself they can be fixed. That’s why your work always reads a little too tender, a little too precise. (and I love it)

You adore your readers, but their silence terrifies you. Every post that doesn’t get notes feels like a verdict, doesn’t it? When someone sends an ask, you light up, but you read it three times before answering, just to make sure you sound casual. You’re careful not to sound like you need them, even when you do.

Your “no NSFW” rule isn’t prudishness but about boundaries. You understand your own discomfort better than most people your age. You know where the line is, and you draw it unapologetically. You guard your creative space fiercely because you’ve learned what happens when people push you past what feels safe.

You work better at night because the world is quieter then, and you don’t have to perform. You eat snacks at your desk, often without realising you’ve done it (maybe?). You have an emotional association with stationery (post-its, highlighters, tabs) because tangible order calms you.

You make bullet lists when you’re uneasy. Sometimes it’s fic ideas, sometimes it’s tasks, sometimes it’s just words that make sense when feelings don’t. You call it organizing, but it’s therapy.

You get complimented for being 'sweet' and 'approachable' but you’re neither, not really. You’re strategic. You’re kind because you’ve decided to be, not because you can’t help it. That’s why people trust you; your warmth has edges.

You hate disappointing people, yet you fantasize about disappearing for a month and letting the queue post in your place. You want to be missed without being questioned. (again, who doesn't?)

You like being in charge, but you’re tired of being needed.

oops, I wrote a little too long (usually it's because I relate)