#deduction

[autistobrat]

the way you did even that one blog deduction i saw was so cool! its amazing the social things you found or guessed, just so cool!

couldypudomeplease

90th

Your ask already gives away the central thing about you. You open with excitement about someone else’s deductions before immediately asking for your own, but the wording collapses together into couldypudomeplease, as if you and I are in a real life conversation and you half-expect me to ignore it.

Your entire blog reads like someone trying to convert internal chaos into external structure before it overwhelms them. It is funny on the surface, but underneath it there is exhaustion baked into the phrasing.

What I noticed is that you build identity through accumulation.

Most people make intros by summarising themselves. You make intros by stacking details until a silhouette forms. Pronouns, fandoms, wolves, musicals, shapeshifters, playlists, userboxes, random phrases about skin theft, Australia in all caps, MAO, Tangotek obsession, commissions, ancient mythology, werewolves, body horror jokes, mutual affection, sleep problems, Minecraft rain. None of these individually define you. Together they do.

That tells me you do not experience yourself as one clean, stable category. You experience yourself as a constellation of hyperfixations, moods, aesthetics, jokes, attachments, and emotional fragments that only make sense when viewed together.

Your communication style is deeply social, but in a very specific way. You are constantly trying to reduce friction between yourself and others (your ask is a good example). You explain your nicknames, explain your phrasing, explain your boundaries, explain your commissions, explain your tags, explain your comfort levels. That usually comes from someone who has spent a long time worrying about being misunderstood, too intense, or accidentally rude.

Therapy time because I'm like that: Don't give a fuck. Who are they to care? It's your life. Frolic around.

Anyways back to the deduction:

Yet despite all that explaining, you are not restrained at all emotionally.

You yell in text. You exaggerate constantly. You repeat phrases for rhythm. You use absurd humour to soften darker thoughts. 'Talking about hiding the body' exists right next to 'I love asks!' and 'cats >:3' (honestly? real twin). Everything gets thrown into the same emotional soup and somehow still remains coherent.

The strongest pattern throughout your blog is attachment.

Not just liking things. You do not casually enjoy creators or fandoms. You imprint on them. The title is 'I am crashing out over this end', which is most probably a Minecraft reference (I only know the Unstable smp so I can't. really be sure). The way you talk about TangoTek specifically is almost protective, like excitement becomes loyalty in your brain. You repeatedly frame interests in emotional terms rather than analytical ones. You don’t engage halfway.

That same intensity applies to people.

You repeatedly emphasise mutuals, asks, interaction, tagging, community, nicknames. Even your commissions are framed less like transactions and more like collaborative enthusiasm. You want interaction to feel alive. You want evidence that people are present with you, not just near you.

The shapeshifter, vampire, werewolf, goblin, monster imagery is not random fandom residue either. It all points toward the same underlying thing: discomfort with stable personhood. You consistently gravitate toward identities that are mutable, hidden, transformed, or partially inhuman. Not because you genuinely think you are nonhuman in a literal sense necessarily, but because those metaphors feel more accurate than rigid social categories do.

You also have a very obvious sensory and emotional orientation toward the world. Music, rain sounds, textures, aesthetics, old-fashioned clothing, Minecraft ambiance, playlists, visual boards. You organise emotion through atmosphere.

And then there’s the exhaustion.

Buried underneath all the humour and capslock and feral goblin energy(?) is someone who sounds perpetually overstimulated. You mention insomnia, anxiety suspicions, crashing out, inconsistency, forgetfulness, feeling trapped, not knowing who you are anymore. But instead of collapsing inward, you externalise all of it into performance, community, jokes, and creation.

Which is... honestly smarter than what a lot of people do.

[deductick]

A few exercises to improve your deduction skills:

• Observation without judgment.

Go outside and pick out a person. What do you see?

Incorrect: He's well-dressed.

Correct: He's wearing a black coat, blue jeans, new sneakers, and holding a cup with a coffee shop logo.

Note the details. The important things are in the details.

• Look for inconsistencies.

In conversation, in the news, in advertising. People can say or write one thing, but do something completely different.

If you notice a contradiction, note it. The brain quickly learns to notice gaps or breaks in logic.

• Ask "Why?"

If you see a traffic jam, ask "Why did it happen?"

If a friend doesn't look well, ask "Why? What could have happened?"

Build cause-and-effect relationships.

However, don't immediately assume your guesses are the absolute truth; always test your assumptions. Don't give up if your guesses are initially wrong — you're just learning to notice what others don't always see.

[newstech24]

Sheffield Wednesday Takeover Confirmed: New Era Begins, Future Points Deduction Threat Vanishes!

Hillsborough has seen its share of drama, triumph, and crushing despair, but few periods in its storied history can rival the tumultuous, soul-crushing saga of the past year. Yet, amidst the wreckage, a phoenix might just be rising. The long-awaited, breath-holding takeover of Sheffield Wednesday has officially been completed, with Arise Capital Partners seizing control of the club on the final,…

Sheffield Wednesday Takeover Confirmed: New Era Begins, Future Points Deduction Threat Vanishes!

[autistobrat]

Hello if it's still available could I possibly be deduced?

If not that's completely ok :)

I took too long :')

89th

You present yourself simply, almost to the point where it feels intentional. 'Hello'. 'Lily'. No dramatics, no layered irony, no attempt to stand out immediately, unlike some blogs I deduced. Which is not a lack of personality. It's restraint. You are choosing not to overwhelm people at first contact, which usually means you are more comfortable revealing things gradually rather than all at once.

Your ask follows the same pattern. You make the request, then immediately give me an out. That is politeness, yes, but it is also risk management. You are reducing the chance of rejection feeling personal by framing it as optional from the start. You are not unsure of what you want. You are careful about how you ask for it. And you got it, so. Win-win :D

Your blog itself is deliberately unstructured. You state outright that there is no set theme and that you will post whatever you feel like. That is not laziness. It is flexibility. You are allowing your interests to shift without locking yourself into a single identity too early. Given that you are writing multiple novels and exploring different creative outlets, that makes sense. You are still in the phase where exploration matters more than consistency.

The way you describe your skills is very specific. 'Beginner level, please don’t assume I’m good'. 'Very slowly learning how to draw'. Some may say it's false modesty, but to me it looks like expectation control. You are making sure no one builds you up to a level you feel you cannot meet yet. You would rather be underestimated than disappoint someone who expected more.

At the same time, you are clearly ambitious. Writing two novels, even if one is paused due to writer’s block, is not casual. You care about storytelling enough to commit to long-form projects, even when progress is inconsistent. The fact that you openly call a whole paragraph 'irrelevant' because of writer’s block shows that you are a little frustrated with your own pace, but not enough to quit. You are still holding onto the projects.

Your interests are wide but not random. Sharks, music, fandoms, writing, language learning. There is a pattern of curiosity and quiet fascination rather than intensity. You are drawn to things because you like them, not because they fit a particular image. That gives your blog a kind of soft, drifting aesthetic rather than a sharply defined one.

Now this is. going to be either very accurate or very wrong. so.

I would say that you have a slightly offbeat way of engaging with the world that is more sensory and internal than socially reactive. You latch onto things because they feel right, whether that is the way something looks, sounds, or flows, rather than because of how others perceive it. You are not always tuned into subtle social signals, which would makes things like flirting or reading intent more difficult than they probably should be. Your attention doesn’t like staying still for long too, so you may often fidget or daydream. You spend a lot of time in your head, building scenarios, stories, or just letting your thoughts drift alongside music, which I dare say would be one of the more consistent anchors in your routine.

How did I arrive in that conclusion? Well. Long story short I'm a psychic (not really) and I have read a lot of blogs so I can kind of. see the blog owner. Also I know a fellow eccentric when I see one.

[autistobrat]

Can I have a deduction???????

oh my god you don't have an intro post.

welp I'll see what my shit brain can do :'D

86th

You present yourself as directionless, but not in a helpless way. 'No Idea What I Am Doing' sounds chaotic on the surface, yet the way you actually post suggests something quieter. You are not spiraling. You are drifting, and there is a difference. Drifting implies movement without a strict plan, but still with awareness of where you are at any given moment.

Your ask is loud compared to the rest of your presence. Multiple question marks, no softening, no apology. That tells me you are comfortable jumping into interaction when you feel like it, even if your usual posting style is more observational. You do not overthink every interaction, only the ones that matter.

Your content splits cleanly into two modes. One is everyday commentary, which reads as humour but also carries a trace of self-awareness. The second mode is fandom engagement, where you focus on whatever has currently captured your attention, hence nowadays, it's Paris the musical. That suggests you move through interests in phases rather than maintaining a fixed set of long-term obsessions. Hence your username.

Judging by your overall posting style of your irl interactions, I think you are not overly defensive, but you do pay attention to how others perceive you, even if you respond with humour instead of direct confrontation.

You do not have an intro post, which usually means one of two things. Either you do not feel the need to define yourself for others, or you have not decided how to yet. Given the rest of your blog, it leans toward the first. You are not trying to package yourself into something easily understood. You are letting your posts accumulate into a picture over time. Which is bad news for me apparently :'D

Adding on to this, the first thing I noticed about your blog was that you barely customised it. People will usually insert a silly little header image, change the blog title's font, add a blog description, etc etc, but you minimised those changes. Which tells me that you really don't care how you come off the first time; you prefer making your identity clear whilst interacting.

Your ask button being simply 'Ask things' fits that pattern. It is neutral, functional, and not particularly expressive. You are open to interaction, but you are not trying to shape how it happens beyond the basics. That suggests a preference for low-pressure communication rather than highly curated social dynamics.

So overall, you are someone who is casually observant, slightly self-aware in a way you do not fully advertise, and comfortable existing without a clearly defined persona. You are simply not forcing yourself into a structure you do not feel like maintaining. The 'no idea' framing is less about confusion and more about refusing to pretend you have everything figured out when you do not see the point. Wise.

[autistobrat]

Can you please do a deduction of me? :)

You sent this ask on 23rd of November, 2025, and your intro post was made on 19th of November, so I think it's safe to say that you saw one of my deduction posts -> you made the intro post -> contemplated whether to send an ask / forgot about sending the ask -> sent the ask

anyways

that is what you can expect

85th

You don’t hesitate when you present yourself. You stack identity, fandoms, opinions, boundaries, and jokes all in one place and just… let it sit there. That is not subtle, but it is honest. You are not trying to curate a mysterious or aesthetic persona. You are trying to make sure people get the full picture quickly so they don’t misread you.

The way you write is loud on purpose. The caps, the repetition, the slightly chaotic phrasing like “BUBBLE IS MY PRIDE AND JOY HE IS THE WONDERFUL” is not just excitement. It is emphasis. You want people to feel your interests, not just register them. That kind of expression usually comes from someone who is used to being very enthusiastic and not always being taken seriously for it, so instead of toning it down, you lean into it harder.

At the same time, your boundaries are very clear, and much sharper than your tone might suggest. You explicitly state that you are a minor, you tell adults not to be weird, you reject hateful behavior, and you set limits on what kinds of asks you will respond to. That is not random. That is awareness. You know that being open and expressive online comes with risks, and you are trying to control those risks in a very direct way. Good good.

Your identity section shows that you are in an active process of figuring things out, but you are not confused in a passive way. You are experimenting, labelling, adjusting, and even joking about the labels themselves. Saying 'maybe that’s a form of aroace, idk' is not ignorance. It is flexibility. You are allowing yourself to refine your understanding instead of forcing it into something fixed too early.

Your interests span a mix of darker media and more playful or mainstream fandoms, which suggests you are drawn to strong emotional or dramatic storytelling, but you do not limit yourself to one tone. You can engage with something intense like “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream” and then immediately pivot to something more chaotic or humourous. That range is is curiosity, I think.

The way you include your religion and then immediately clarify your political stance is particularly telling. You are aware that people make assumptions, and you are pre-emptively correcting them. That shows a level of social awareness that goes beyond the rest of your chaotic presentation. You are managing how others might interpret you.

Your humour is aggressive but not malicious. Phrases like “asshole fucker bitchass shit” (can you tell I like that phrase) are not directed at anyone specific. They function more like noise, a way to release energy and keep the tone from becoming too serious. You are not trying to insult people. You are trying to keep things from feeling stiff or controlled. Also it's a lot unhinged and funnier that way.

[autistobrat]

I kinda want to see what you can deduce from my blog but i am worried that youll either (a) rip me apart and lay me bare emotionally or (b) you'll just not like it ig. Can you tell im a tad nervous

You’re worried I’ll rip you apart, but you already did half the work yourself. I’m just… tidying the evidence :))

84th

You don’t hide your nervousness. You narrate it. The way you asked, laying out both possible outcomes and bracing for them in advance, shows that you are not afraid of being analyzed. You are afraid of being reduced. There is a difference. You can handle intensity. What you don’t like is the idea that someone might flatten you into something simple or final and see through yourself. Which.... is exactly what I aim to do in this little deduction voodoo trick so enjoy :D

Your title THE GENDER BOSS is doing something very specific. It is loud, exaggerated, almost comedic, but it sits on top of an identity that is actually quite fluid and conditional. You describe your pronouns as flexible, with certain leanings depending on how you feel in the moment. That contrast suggests that the boldness is not false, but it is compensatory. You are asserting control over something that, by nature, does not stay fixed. It is less about dominance and more about reclaiming stability in a space where stability is not guaranteed.

The way you describe your past self in your updated intro is unusually direct. You admit that you barely knew yourself and that you were too exhausted to put effort into your previous presentation. That kind of retrospective honesty indicates growth, but also a willingness to acknowledge that your identity is not static. You are not trying to present a consistent version of yourself across time. You are explicitly allowing for change, even contradiction.

Your stance on not cleaning up old posts reinforces this. You are not interested in curating a perfectly consistent archive. You accept that your past views may conflict with your present ones, and you are willing to let that contradiction remain visible. That suggests a tolerance for imperfection and a rejection of the idea that identity has to be polished or linear. Which is good. Gold star for you :D

At the same time, there is a recurring theme of exhaustion. You mention being tired, not having time to maintain your blog in a precise way, and struggling with things like tagging. This does not read as laziness to me. More like a.... limited bandwidth, I should say. You are choosing where to put your energy, and meticulous curation is not where it goes.

Your blog content being described as a 'reblog machine' with no clear theme is consistent with that. You are not trying to present a cohesive aesthetic or brand. You are using your blog as a space to collect things that resonate with you (or just funny) in the moment. This creates a kind of fragmented identity on the surface, but underneath it reflects a genuine range of interests rather than a lack of direction.

Your boundaries are interesting because they are selective but firm. You do not believe in strict DNI lists, yet you clearly state that people who lack respect or engage with generative AI should leave. That indicates that you do not rely on formal structures to enforce boundaries, but you do have clear internal lines that you expect others to respect.

The 'do not flirt with me please! :3' line is another example of that. The tone is light, but the boundary is not optional. You soften the delivery, but you still make the rule explicit. This pattern appears repeatedly. You prefer to communicate boundaries in a way that does not escalate tension, but you still communicate them.

Your inclusion of mutuals and the way you talk about them shows that you value your social connections, but you also admit that your memory is unreliable and that the list is incomplete. You are not trying to present a perfect social image. You are presenting what you can, as you are.

The small tracking system with 'gold stars' and a 'lily from an anon' is particularly revealing. It suggests that you assign meaning to small interactions and keep track of them in a way that is personal rather than performative. They are markers for yourself, rather than for others.

The important part is this: you are not afraid of being known. You are afraid of being simplified. That is why you leave everything visible, from old posts to shifting identities, while still resisting anything that tries to define you too narrowly. (Anyways that's what I worked out)

[autistobrat]

Hm

I’m curious, may I have a blog deduction? It’s up to you, I do have an intro post though it’s not super detailed. If you don’t have enough to work off of you’re free to skip this one. 👍👍

*checks your intro post* *looks at the reblogs*

You are very self deprecative, end of deduction :D

*cough* here's the full version:

83rd

You don’t enter spaces loudly. You hover at the edge and make sure it’s acceptable to stay. The way you phrased your ask, especially the “if you don’t have enough to work off of you’re free to skip,” is not just courtesy. It’s a pattern. You consistently reduce your own importance in the interaction before the other person has the chance to do it for you. That suggests you are used to not being the centre of attention, and more importantly, you are comfortable structuring yourself that way. You can easily notice that if you look at the reblogs of your own intro post. Also the previous intro post as well; you reblogged (and I quote) 'Ewwwwwwwwww' to yourself. Which is doing all the work here pretty much.

Your blog title, Local Bystander, is not a joke you picked randomly. It’s an identity you’ve settled into. A bystander is present but not central, aware but not intrusive. You are positioning yourself as someone who observes and participates lightly rather than someone who dominates a space. That aligns perfectly with your content habits, which lean heavily toward reblogging, tagging, and engaging with others rather than pushing your own presence forward constantly.

Your communication style is straightforward but softened at the edges. You do not over-explain, but you do include small signals like emojis and casual phrasing to keep things approachable. This is especially interesting given that you are deaf, because it suggests that you are very intentional about tone in text. You compensate for the lack of auditory cues by making sure your written communication carries enough emotional clarity to avoid misinterpretation.

Your identity is stated clearly and without hesitation. You mention being trans, aroace, and an adult in a very matter-of-fact way. There is no attempt to dramatise or justify it. It reads as something you have already processed and accepted, and now you simply present it as context rather than something up for discussion.

The small note about not wanting your posts used in the context of force-feminisation is very specific, and that specificity matters. It suggests that you are aware of how content can be taken out of context and repurposed in ways that are uncomfortable or harmful. You are not broadly restrictive, but when something crosses a line, you define that line clearly. That indicates a strong sense of personal boundaries, even if you present yourself as low-key and easygoing.

Your willingness to be tagged in things is one of the more revealing parts of your profile. You explicitly invite people to involve you, whether it is in tag games or random posts. That tells me you enjoy participation, but in a way that is initiated by others. You are not pushing yourself into conversations, but you are very open to being pulled into them. That fits the bystander identity you have chosen. You are present and willing, but you prefer the invitation to come from outside rather than asserting yourself. Probably because you think you don't matter that much but let me assure you, you do.

The way you maintain multiple spaces, such as your art blog and your community, shows that you are more active than your main blog might suggest. You are not passive, but just selective about where and how you put your energy. Your main blog acts more like a hub or a social space, while your art blog and community are where more focused engagement happens.

There is a difference between minimising yourself because you feel small and structuring yourself because you prefer a certain kind of interaction. You fall into the second category but you yourself think you are the first case. Which.... is understandable :D