I started to read Fahrenheit 451 as my first text for this new resolution. Two reasons for this: one, it’s thin – it’s a small book and only 184 pages. In terms of an easy manageable task, this suited me perfectly. Two, I ‘borrowed’ it from work about six years ago because I was told by someone it’s the perfect text to make you appreciate the books that we all know we should read, but few of us rarely do.
I won’t even lie: in my head, I had an idea that this would be like a fireman film (think Backdraft-esque) crossed with Equilibrium and after seeing a trailer for the new series based on the book, that idea was solidified.
For those of you that haven’t heard of the book, the main character is a fireman and a fireman’s job is to burn books and those that do read books are hunted down through the use of a mechanical hound.
I think with Equilibrium in mind, I was very much focused on it being about the emotions that writing and art provide, but that definitely hindered me in understanding the text. But about sixty pages in, I clicked onto the point of the book and was blown away and had to keep checking the publishing date because this was published in 1953. Call it what would happen if political correctness went way too far (the way some claim it is), call it dumbing down the world, call it what we might turn into if politics is conducted through twitter. Fahrenheit 451 explores the consequences of humans’ desire for quick hits of controlled, easy information rather than fully exploring ideas, even if they are uncomfortable.
I’m 100 pages in now. Montag, the main character takes a while to settle into: his wife the first time we meet her, is close to death because she has taken pills and the care of her is treated like servicing a machine. Montag’s distant reaction to it is hard to understand at first, but it makes sense once you realise what has become important in this society. His walks with the girl next door are perfectly innocent and it’s more about what they talk about than anything else.
But this bit surprised me and I’d be interested in people’s thoughts: at one point when talking about books a character says: ‘You can shut them [books] and say ‘Hold on a moment’. You can play God to it.’
I never thought of books that way. That I can try out a new world, a new idea and, if something gets too uncomfortable, I can shut the book. That I have the power to pause. Because TV and films can haunt you if you glance at an image, create stark pictures that even without context can disturb (my parents will certainly agree with that given the nightmares I had as a five year old having glanced at a TV when Batman was on and the joker was in a vat of acid), but a book…usually the uncomfortable feelings come from the detail, the build-up, our investment and the emotional atmosphere that the writer creates. In many ways that it’s like having a parent watching over you – new experiences are offered, but there’s a safety net if you get uncertain. And the good books should give you that, should take you to a new place that you can, in some ways, control. But I think of people that I know who are anxious and I wonder, how much do books help us explore the world and offer different perspectives in a safe way?
And that’s what’s important about this book. That we need to have context, experiences and be challenged. And it has made me more willing to look back at those ‘clever books’ I usually avoid because actually how brilliant are the things they offer?
I’ll finish Fahrenheit 451 off today because I have a lovely long journey coming up. Gonna grab a book from the page my book is on next – the two that interested me the most were ‘The Super Ladies’ by Susan Petrone and ‘Beyond Relatively Normal’ by Mikaela Hancock. ‘The Super Ladies’ is, from what I gather, about three middle aged women in Cleveland that become superheroes while ‘Beyond Relatively Normal’ seems to be a modern, slightly surreal take on Jack in the Beanstalk.
Both sound fantastically fun!