Okay, guys, I think it would be interesting if we sat down and had a conversation about anthropology/archaeology on either side of the pond. I'll start off by summing up some of the basic differences?
heavy emphasis on social anthropology/functionalism/structuralism
archaeology is a separate discipline
Malinowski, Radcliffe-Brown, Max Gluckman, and Edmund Leach (anthro)
The Leakeys, Bell&Lawrence, Renfrew?, Shanks et al (arch)
four field approach: linguistics, cultural, physical, archaeology
can be further divisions and considerations within the above, and some studies will combine aspects of more than one field but one is usually "primary"
Boas, Mead, Benedict, Whorf, Geertz, and Harris; Jefferson, Binford, Schiffer
Some thinkers and ideas were important to both--Malinowski, Levi-Strauss, Marcel Mauss, etc--and both spring from the earlier tradition of men such as Tylor and Morgan. Of interesting note is that the Leakeys and their findings are treated as part of physical anthropology in the US. Clearly, also, I know a good deal less about foundational thinkers/figures in UK archaeology, so I apologise if I screwed up on that one!
Thoughts? katebishhop melpomene-themis seascribe tilathebun