Response to Decolonization is Not a Metaphor.
Shoutout to Metamatar (Who has sadly left Tumblr, of their own will, probably for depressing Current Events reasons I'm guessing) for showing me this, and I think it's worth sharing.
It's a response to that one "Decolonization is Not a Metaphor" paper by Tuck & Yang that's been going around a lot and I think it addresses a problems with that original paper well.
Like, said original paper has some stuff adjacent to good points. Like, "landback" does, in fact, mean at least returning some of the goddamn land ("Give all national parks back to the native nations, we can figure the rest out from there" is my general position), and the idea that we do need to center the fact that harm is still being done to redress it.
But like, on the rest of Tuck and Yang's paper... well, it came off more than a little ethnostate-y to me, if you get my drift. Like, I was not surprised to learn they're apparently zionists, because that's where a lot of their logic leads.
And I think this paper addresses why in far smarter terms than I ever could, while at the same time being committed to decolonization to a far deeper and smarter degree, in a way that's also closer to what most Landback people I know seem to actually believe...

















