Ok so I think I finally figured out what personality type Natasha has. Ironically enough she was really hard to type and she ended up being the same type as me!
Introverted+Sensing+Thinking+Judging
The first letter signifies the source and direction of a person’s energy expression: Introvert vs Extravert. An introvert has a source of energy mainly in their own internal world. The second letter represents the method by which someone perceives information: Sensing vs Intuitive. Sensing means that a person mainly believes information he or she receives directly from the external world. The third letter represents how a person processes information: Thinking vs Feeling. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic. The last letter reflects how a person implements the information he or she has processed: Judging vs Perceiving. Judging means that a person organizes all of his/her life events and, as a rule, sticks to his/her plans.
ISTJs are quietly systematic, factual, organized, logical detailed, conscientious, analytical, responsible, pragmatic, critical, conservative, decisive, stable, concrete, and efficient.
ISTJs are responsible organizers, driven to create and enforce order within systems and institutions. They are neat and orderly, inside and out, and tend to have a procedure for everything they do. They are reliable and dutiful and want to uphold tradition and follow regulations. This is what makes Natasha a great agent/assassin. This also complements Clint’s tendency to have a bit of chaos around him. Natasha can keep him in line when she needs to. They each have their own ways of going about missions which happen to work really well together and can help each other see things in a different perspective.
ISTJs are steady, productive contributors. Even though they are introverted, they are rarely isolated; typical ISTJs know just where they belong in life, and want to understand how they can participate in established organizations and systems. This is what makes Natasha very effective in espionage. She knows how to fit into society and stands out in that way where as Clint takes to the shadows and tries to keep his distance from people. She has the ability to seem extraverted when she wants to.
ISTJs like to know what the rules of the game are, valuing predictability more than imagination. They rely on their past experiences to guide them, and are most comfortable in familiar surroundings. They trust the proven method, and appreciate the value of dedicated practice to build confidence in their skills. This is another area where she and Clint differ. Natasha isn’t really one to take chances. She really thinks things through before she acts and is a planner. This also goes hand in hand with loyalty. This is one of the reasons why she stayed with the Black Widow program for so long, it was all she knew and was familiar with and so that is where her loyalties lied. And then next with SHIELD and Clint. She is a very loyal person.
ISTJs are hardworking and will persist until the task is done. They are logical and methodical, and often enjoy tasks that require them to use step-by-step reasoning to solve a problem. They are meticulous in their attention to details, and examine things closely to be sure they are correct. With their straightforward logic and orientation to detail, they work systematically to bring order to their own small parts of the world. Natasha always gets things done and does it well. She is one to rarely make mistakes. She is definitely not someone you would want sent after you because she will do her job and you probably won’t even see it coming.
ISTJs have a serious, conservative air about them. Where as Clint is naturally a trouble-maker with a wicked sense of humor, Natasha is naturally more serious with a dry sense of humor. She can have a good time but she doesn’t put herself out there and doesn’t make a fool of herself. Clint has helped her most in this area, he is able to make her relax and make her laugh. ISTJs are practical and no-nonsense, and rarely call attention to themselves. Their clothes and possessions even tend to be chosen based on utility rather than fashion. They typically speak in a straightforward manner and have a good head for details. They are usually more enthusiastic about sharing factual information than exploring abstract concepts or unproven ideas. Clint and Natasha have always been able to be honest with each other, even before they became partner’s. They both can be blunt in how they speak.
ISTJs have sharp, fact-based minds, and prefer autonomy and self-sufficiency to reliance on someone or something. Dependency on others is often seen by them as a weakness, and their passion for duty, dependability and impeccable personal integrity forbid falling into such a trap. Natasha is very independent and the only person she will accept help from is Clint and possibly Phil. You really see this in Vietnam when Clint is trying to connect with her on a more personal level. She’s not used to relying on anyone and he wanted her to rely on him in every sense of the word. He wanted her trust which is something they both struggle with and ended up gaining in each other.
To ISTJs, honesty is far more important that emotional considerations, and their blunt approach leaves others with the false impression that they are cold, or even robotic. People with this type may struggle to express emotion or affection outwardly. It’s interesting how two people who have a hard time expressing emotion were able to click so well. But they are able to express their emotions honestly with each other and in complete faith that they will not use that against each other.
Their strengths are that they are honest and direct, strong-willed and dutiful, very responsible, calm and practical, create and enforce order, jack-of-all-trades, good at listening, precise and detailed.
Their weaknesses are that they are stubborn, always by the book, insensitive, judgmental, often unreasonably blame themselves, can become too rigid, not generous with praise, desires to always be right, and not in tune with feelings.
The dominant cognitive function is Introverted Sensing (Si). Si means they look at information in terms of facts and details, focusing more on the here and now rather than possibilities for the future. They feel comfortable in areas of proven experience, and take a realistic approach. Si is used primarily to govern the inner world of thoughts and emotions. They seek to develop a realistic understanding of the world as it is, in the light of what they observe. They are pragmatic in nature, constantly learning to adapt to the world as it is now, and are constantly expanding their inner store of facts, information and experiences.
The secondary function is Extraverted Thinking (Te). Te manifests as the ability to take concrete, efficient action on the user’s analysis of what they best things to do would be. They like to control the outside world. They are systematic, methodical, deliberate, and strategic in their approach. They proceed carefully and slowly, looking ahead to avoid potential obstacles and to prepare for contingencies. They look through an impersonal and objective lens when problem-solving.
The tertiary function is Introverted Feeling (Fi). Fi manifest as a strong, unwavering set of morals and values which the user draws upon to dictate many of their major decisions. When Fi is underdeveloped, they are prone to take things personally. They may be quick to overreact and defend themselves. They do not always enjoy ready access to their own emotions. Since they lack an inner control, they try and control the outside world via their Extraverted Thinking.
The inferior function is Extraverted Intuition (Ne). Ne originally manifests as a reluctance to try new ways of doing things, occasionally giving way to anxiety over the unknown. New things are threatening and can only give way to risks and dangers, and therefore they stick to what they know because it’s reliable. They see experimenting as reckless and irresponsible. If one does not conquer this function, they might not always make the right decision since not everything can be straightforward and based on logic.
submitted by @monicamcentee
really cool character analysis of Natasha by @monicamcentee