mormoopidae replied to your post “mormoopidae replied to your post “My autistic ass is wondering if...”
as a modern identifier it’s been associated with people whose beliefs are rather extreme and who deny the existence of gay and bi trans people as well as nonbinary people. but that’s my experience from this discourse a few years ago, where the people who identified as hbsers were vocally angry with truscum for allowing these people.
btw i don’t like to get involved in any medical/non-medical trans discourse bc as far as i’m concerned people can do what they want and hrt should be easy to obtain since it’s an individual decision that has a lot of factors and isn’t even exclusive to trans ppl. i lurked a lot when i was a teenager bc i was just figuring out gender stuff and all the infighting definitely didn’t help, but at least the resources on dysphoria did.
Modern? It’s 13 years old. It just endorses and relies on trans politics from 1955.
And yes, a lot of (but not all) HBSers are violently queerantagonistic; it’s a natural consequence of the “otherwise normal” part of their politics.
(And no, in my experience and those of my NB headmates and partners, truscum and transmeds are not particularly accepting of NB people. Extremely, violently the opposite of that, in fact.)
But... if you don’t want to be associated with those people, you probably shouldn’t be taking your politics, tactics, terminology, and identifiers from them?
